detail information
| Posted by | Seán Byrne |
| Posted on | 18/03/06 08:54 |
| Number of views | 17805 |
Positive:
Supports DVD+/-R and DVD+/-RW
Negative:
Poor DVD+RW recording quality on most of our discs, particularly with the included DVD+RW, resulting in compatibility issues with two of our test discs.
As this is only our second review of a standalone DVD recorder, we can only compare it against one of its big brothers, the Lite-On LVW-5045. Besides the lack of a HDD and its smaller size, this DVD recorder is fairly cut back on features, such as no CD recording support, no Videoplus+ or stereo tuner and very limited editing capabilities for recordings. On the other hand, it includes very good MPEG4 XviD and DivX support, which the LVW-5045 lacks altogether. Unfortunately, when it comes to recording picture quality, the LVW-5045 seems to do a much better job, particularly at its 1 to 2 hour play modes. The main positive points: Unlike many VCRs, Lite-On seems to have developed this DVD recorder with the novice user in mind by minimising the amount of steps to carry out a task as well as guide the user for many tasks at the touch of a button. It features excellent DVD+R and DVD-R/RW recording quality, including no compatibility issues in any of our equipment with any these particular formats. For those with a high end TV with component input, this can be connected via its component output and also features coaxial digital audio output for 5.1 surround sound systems. Finally, it supports most of the capabilities available on most VCRs including MPEG4 support, making this a good DVD player replacement, not to mention its small footprint.
The main negative points: The main negative point has to be its recording picture quality in the 1 to 2 hour play modes as the LVW-5045 shows a significant improvement with the same play modes. The lack of chapter editing also means that one cannot set chapter marks except as a recording is taking place. Some consumers may be disappointed by the lack of a stereo tuner and Videoplus+ support. While this recorder gave better quality PI/PIF scans with DVD+RW media than the LVW-5045, all but one of our DVD+RW scans were within the guidelines for good quality media. Finally, for audio playback, the recorder crashes on certain low bit rate WMA files and its MP3 playback sound quality is quite poor.
To sum it all up, this DVD recorder can easily replace an existing DVD player as well as possibly the VCR and we would recommend it to anyone looking for a very user-friendly easy to use DVD recorder. For anyone looking to change from VHS to DVD to record daily shows, TV programmes, transfer camcorder footage, to do away with wearing out tapes or the tedious rewinding & fast-forwarding process associated with VHS tapes, this would also make an ideal replacement.
You may discuss/comment this review below or in this forum thread. This forum thread may also be used to ask questions around this drive or request additional tests.
Thanks to:
SVP Communication - The United Kingdom for providing the DVD-RW and DVD+R/RW media used in this review.
E-Net Distribution - United Kingdom for providing the RiDisc DVD-R, Datawrite Blue DVD-R and Datawrite Titanium DVD-R media used in this review.
MMORE International B.V. - The Netherlands for providing the MMore DVD-R media used in this review.
Daxon Technology Inc - Taiwan for providing the Siera DVD-R media used in this article.
Medea International - United Kingdom for providing the Infiniti DVD-R media used in this review.






I don´t understand the following text in this review about the Lite-On LVW-1105HC:
http://www.cdfreaks.com/article/263/11
Positive:
Excellent DVD+R, DVD-R and DVD-RW recording quality.
Negative:
Disappointing recorded picture quality with both HQ and SP modes.
What do these words mean:
recording quality
and what does these words means:
recorded picture quality
or is the meaning of them the same?
If both words have the same meaning, then there ist the decent recording quality.
In the review stand this:
Decent recording quality in its long play modes.
Allthough, isn´t that Long Play Modus is always not so good as short play or HQ modus?
Why is the record quality from the long play modus in this Lite-On LVW-1105HC even better then the record quality in the HQ or SP modus?
Friendly Greetings from
Moe Perry


add a tag