When someone purchases a song on iTunes, one thing they may not realise is that iTunes embeds some account information into the song file, including the user's full name and account e-mail. As a result, a song that gets leaked out can be potentially traced back to the owner. However, as all iTunes music up until recently has been crippled with DRM, this has not been an issue, since no one would distribute a DRM crippled file knowing that it will only play on a limited number of authorised devices.
Now that iTunes has launched its DRM free iTunes Plus service, some consumers may assume that it is ok to pass a copy of their purchased music on to friends now that these will play without restriction. However, as the songs carry the owner's account information, there is a high risk that if someone ends up sharing out the songs online, anti-piracy organisations can easily view this embedded information. While it is not clear if there is any audio watermarking present, the information is embedded as plain text within each song.
However, one drawback with the plain text information is that it can be easily spoofed, which means that if a copyright iTunes track is discovered on a file sharing network, it would be difficult to tell if the embedded info has been spoofed. The info would also be lost if the song is converted into MP3 or any other audio format.
Thanks to GristyMcFisty for letting us know about this news.
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By
Sebastian Mares (guest),
Fri 1 Jun 2007 18:16
I am not sure if that information can be used in face of a court in Germany for example. According to German rights, you are allowed to give music to your friends and these friends can also give the music to their friends as long as each person doesn't share the file to more than eight persons. So if your friend is a jerk and puts the files online, even if the files have another account information, the friend is the one to blame and not the original purchaser.
For once, I will not argue about this issue. The fact is that consumers complained about the fact that DRM crippled cannot be played on all of their devices. Removing FRM allows the consumer to play their music freely, but not to share it on the p2p networks; which is (let's admit it) a fair solution.
Sharing music on p2p is not legal in many places, and if a consumer still does it, he should face the consequences.
By
BurnMaster (guest),
Mon 4 Jun 2007 08:24
"...there is no way to prove you're innocent." - there is if you report the theft to the Police asap and ensure you get a crime reference number. But you would have to do it asap, there's no point waiting until a month later when the crap might have hit the fan.
By
DBC (guest),
Tue 5 Jun 2007 18:04
>Its not your fault if someone stole it, and they put it on
>P2P, you would then be responsible, not the thief!
That's already what some "victims" lobby groups want passed into legislation in Canada in real world terms. That is, if someone steals a gun, baseball bat, knife, car or whatever from your house and uses it while committing a crime, you're going to be charged with that crime. The idea being that it's your fault for not securing your "dangerous" property to prevent the theft to begin with.