Legal complaint accuses MPAA of hiring hacker
Posted on 26/05/06 13:49 by Dan Bell                             
Legal complaint accuses MPAA of hiring hacker

RTV71, DamnedIfIknow, Liggy and SPINESHANK all used our news submit to tell us about a lawsuit filed on Wednesday, that if proven true in court, would put the MPAA in some hot water. In the PDF document linked below, we can read details of the accusation, that the MPAA knowingly hired a person for $15,000, to steal information in an effort obtain evidence of Torrentspy helping copyright violators. This includes hacking into their servers and even reading private emails.

The lawsuit has been filed by Valence Media, the parent company of Torrentspy. They are claiming (click for PDF), an unidentified person was approached by an MPAA executive and was asked to retrieve private information on Torrentspy.com, a search engine that directs people to download links. In the process, they say laws were broken. The MPAA is denying the allegations.

Torrentspy's complaint includes claims that the man whom the MPAA allegedly paid $15,000 to steal e-mail correspondence and trade secrets has admitted his role in the plot and is cooperating with the company.

"It is a Hollywood drama, what happened here," Ira Rothken, Torrentspy's attorney, said in a telephone interview Wednesday evening.

The allegations come three months after the MPAA filed suit against Torrentspy and other directories for allegedly making it easier for pirates to distribute movies over the Internet.

"These claims (by Torrentspy) are false," Kori Bernards, the MPAA's vice president of corporate communications, said in an e-mail to CNET News.com. "Torrentspy is trying to obscure the facts to hide the fact that they are facilitating thievery. We are confident that our lawsuit against them will be successful because the law is on our side."

They have an admission of guilt from the hacker, but now I suppose they need to prove a solid link between him and the MPAA. This is a most interesting story indeed! Did the MPAA step over the line this time? We must keep an eye on it and see how it plays out. Thanks everyone, for bringing this to our attention. For those that wish to read the article in it's entirety at C|Net, simply follow this link!

Source: C|Net

Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By Lord KiRon, Friday 26 May 2006 15:40
I have read somewhere that they have a contract on their hands between the hacker and some MPAA representavie.
By rcacraman, Friday 26 May 2006 21:23
... and even if they did do it ... and they were found guilty .... this would still be morally and ethically justifiable as the MPAA were only committing an actual crime to prevent potential crimes being committed. See? Makes everything all right when you look at it like that. A bit like shooting someone who walks past my house .... they MIGHT have been thinking of robbing it - better to shoot them before they might commit the crime Wink
[edited by rcacraman on 26.05.2006 21:26]
[edited by rcacraman on 26.05.2006 21:26]
By nigor, Friday 26 May 2006 21:59
You could do that, or u can pull up a chair in front of your house and sit Dick Chaney in it. It's about delegating the work Smilie
By rla, Saturday 27 May 2006 07:55
The way things are going with the screwed up court system even if the MPAA were found guilty they would just have to pay $7.99 and give the victim a free DVD. *laughs
By Zzyzxroad, Saturday 27 May 2006 08:12
NOW do some of you think that maybe they also put the virus/trojan in p2p to delete medie files????? I did before, and really think so now
Name: Email:



Your comment:

Receive notification on new comments?