RIAA may target radio broadcasters & listeners next
Posted on 10/10/07 23:53 by Seán Byrne                             
RIAA may target radio broadcasters & listeners next

Following the RIAA's success in a jury civil trial that resulted in Jammie Thomas being fined $222,000 in damages, this DailyTech article takes a look at what the RIAA may sue next, with the Radio looking to be the next target.  Going by this detailed article on The Register, the recording industry made $11.5 billion in sales last year, while broadcast radio makes a steady $20 billion in advertising revenue. 

While radio broadcasters must pay songwriters and publishers for the music they play, the artists and labels don't get anything, so as a result, the record companies are seriously looking for a change.  As radio was seen as a way of promoting music resulting in people buying music, this is where the artists and labels benefited, so as a result broadcasters were not forced into paying royalties for the performance of recordings.  However, with the major growth of radio, especially digital services, such as Internet radio, the RIAA has helped require recording performance royalties to be paid on all digital services, including Internet radio.  The RIAA and SoundExchange which receives sound recording performance royalties are currently in the process of trying to push Congress to require terrestrial radio broadcasters to also pay performance royalties.

While most radio listeners may feel like they have little to fear, simply playing a radio where other people can hear it can be considered copyright infringement.  In the UK where businesses need to pay royalties to run a radio, the car repair firm Kwik-Fit was recently sued for letting its staff listen to the radio and charged £200,000 in damages.  Going by this BBC report, the Performing Rights Society which collects royalties for songwriters and performers carried out a countrywide inspection, recording over 250 incidents of audible music from Kwik-Fit service stations.  The company claimed to have a policy banning staff the use of personal radios in the workplace and thus did not pay any royalties.

With declining music sales, it is quite clear that the record industry will try just about anything to boost its revenue again, with the continuous RIAA lawsuit campaign being just an example.

Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By Bekali (guest), Thu 11 Oct 2007 08:17
This is madness. Frown What's next, baning all ringtones on mobile phones because is copywrited material, and the naughty phone will ring in public places ? clown ©® Bekali supergrin
By anonymous (guest), Thu 11 Oct 2007 10:55
This is going to far! Next they're going to be suing kids on buses because of playing (crap) music on the bus! RIAA need to get a life, they're a pathetic organisation!
By buggsy (guest), Thu 11 Oct 2007 11:58
Being total dicks *is* their life.
By rod (guest), Thu 11 Oct 2007 18:41
Well, everyone needs to burn all the music, and quit listing to the shit, then they wont be getting a dime. puke
By fat burger (guest), Fri 12 Oct 2007 05:32
what ambulance chasers...(sigh)
By SciFer, Fri 12 Oct 2007 19:32
SciFerThey truly are SCUM!!!
By Rich86, Fri 12 Oct 2007 21:00
Rich86Desperate greedy people and organizations do desperate greedy things. Examine everything you do which results in money being sent to organizations who are members of or support the RIAA - and stop those activities. The more this goes on - the less money i spend on recorded music. cool
By klark kent (guest), Sat 13 Oct 2007 02:43
Just a tweak on an old idea. In the U.S., it's the publishers who call up businesses and ask to be put on hold. If you're playing the radio through your music on hold, you will get a bill for $500 to buy an entertainment "license." I can see how the RIAA would like to clip off a piece of that!
By applegodel8, Sat 13 Oct 2007 08:31
applegodel8Its the RIAA that is killing music, and they don't even realize it!
By neo1918, Sun 14 Oct 2007 05:12
"What's next, baning all ringtones..." Nah. You'll just be billed 50c each time your phone rings.
By BitRate, Sun 14 Oct 2007 16:37
They'll be charging people for singing in the toilet next. I say *FARK* the RIAA.
By ArtMuscle (guest), Mon 15 Oct 2007 04:35
And the rich just keep gettin' richer. To the rich, there is no such thing as enough and all us little peons will always be victims of their schemes to make more. They use to get their money screwing the artists, but they make too much now and have fought back, so now they decided to pick on the little guy . . . . us. What's next? Sue us for whistling while we work loud enough for the person next to us to hear us? Or whistling without first paying for the royalties? I think I'm just about done buying CDs and music videos to support those @--holes.
By steve119 (guest), Mon 15 Oct 2007 13:14
for fock sake!!!!! nobody hum neither!"!! Stick Out Tongue
By DO_IT (guest), Mon 15 Oct 2007 16:40
If they kill radio their influence on society will be greatly diminished (MTV rarely plays music anymore). This will accelerate their demise. A FEW people will go to satellite radio, the majority will run to P2P programs. Kids will find other things to do and when they get older they won't be as excited about music because they didn't have it when they were kids. It'll be like reading books. Let's hope they do.
By DJ Specs, Tue 16 Oct 2007 04:26
This is a good thing, as radio stations will basically dump any music from record labels that take part in this. That's great! Turn the crap, play more independent musicians.
By dreadd, Wed 17 Oct 2007 09:46
Look at this http://neowin.net/news/main/07/10/17/riaa-finds-new-unlikely-target-usenetcom RIAA is crazy lol.
By dreadd, Wed 17 Oct 2007 09:59
Look at this http://neowin.net/news/main/07/10/17/riaa-finds-new-unlikely-target-usenetcom RIAA is crazy lol.

Name: Email:



Your comment:

Receive notification on new comments?