StrongBad used our news submit to tell us about a story that relates the attitude of some defiant file-sharers out there. The article states that if the countless file- sharers trolling through cyberspace were intimidated by the spate of lawsuits, you wouldn't know it. Even though as we have read, 261 folks lives are about to be impacted by the U.S. legal system. The other 59 million or so are not taking it seriously. The consensus message from a bounty of cavalier posts aimed at the Recording Industry Association of America became abundantly clear: Bring it on!
Here are a few of their bold remarks of disobedience and contempt directed at the RIAA, it's legal drive and the music industry in general.
Nanuk, for example, heartily pounded his chest along with his cronies on Yahoo "You can take away my MP3's when you pry my mouse out of my cold dead hands." It's all about the money, according to Tnintbubse: "Consumers will not tolerate their price gouging and they need to come up with something else besides suing college kids. The industry has gone unchecked too long and has passed the cost down to us. Now they are crying." Howler24 drew a line of futility between what he feels are two ill-fated crusades: "Yes, you can cry and moan about the 'evils' of drugs and file sharing. But when you're through foaming at the mouth, you have to realize that they are BOTH here to stay. No law, no court can change that. The best thing to do is to control it and make it profitable, instead of driving it underground." From Rmonster: "I have a feeling that anyone who signs up for this 'amnesty' is going to find themselves up the creek. Sending a notarized copy of your ID and statement that you did, in fact, break the law (in their eyes at least) does not sound like amnesty, but suicide." As Apophis sees it, the RIAA is out of touch "It's time for the RIAA as we know it to go away and an agency more in tune with the 21st century needs to be put in its place. One that looks forward and not stuck in decades old business practices." Though greatly outnumbered, some did play devil's advocate --AndyCane, for instance, didn't see much wiggle room for the virtual apologists: "I'm no huge fan of the RIAA, but they have a right to protect their copyrighted material and (neither) you, nor I, nor anyone else, has the right to 'share' it without paying for it, at least not on the scale that it's done on file-sharing sites." Then, of course, there was plenty of cheeky advice. This morsel from SkyPilotTB: "Stop book sharing. Sue libraries." And WWWFairfield hinted at hopping aboard the Justin and Britney bashing bandwagon with his take: "Look at the top ten -- THAT explains why sales of CDs are lacking. Stop looking for pretty faces and recruit real musicians to record and sell music." |
Let's just hope Nanuck was pounding out those remarks on a laptop down at the local Starbucks drinking a Latte. Precious anonymity is being stripped away on the Net.
Source: netscape5.marketwatch.com


so i was forced to buy the cd... this sux for jazz lovers, cuz were forced to scour many prog's JUST TO FIND 1 song... and these are songs that are played in the radio too... not some underground, bomb shelter hidden music either.