Bit-tech editorial ponders DRM
Posted on 25/06/04 02:05 by DamnedIfIknow                             
Bit-tech editorial ponders DRM

Speaking of Napster,  James Morris over at bit-tech.net talks about his own experience with the service and the impact that Digital Rights Management will have on just about any content you come across on the Web.


There are a lot of good things about Napster, but something curious happened to some of the files I'd downloaded (but not yet purchased) the other day. I went to play them, and they were no longer available. Neither were any tracks from that record label. Napster's DRM (digital rights management) system, which operates using Microsoft's Windows Media Player 9, had taken note of the fact that Napster's deal with that record label was on hold, and had deleted the tracks from my hard drive.

If the large corporations have their way, nobody except them will own anything '“ you'll have to keep paying regular fees to use any technology they've produced. As a content producer myself, part of me is glad to see technology that makes it easier for intellectual property creators to force users to pay to use content. But the technology that's currently being developed to lock down the Web has the potential to seriously abuse our rights.

The rest of his thoughts can be found here.

Source: Bit-tech

Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By p_motch, Fri 25 Jun 2004 02:46
Good God, its simple. Don't like DRM? Then don't purchase it. Stop supporting these fools who abuse our rights and don't encourage them by buying their product.
By cynicalbastard, Fri 25 Jun 2004 07:29
it's frighteningly simple: who'd pay more for less? Crappy compressed files and DRM make CDs look like a technological marvel, and the pinnacle of flexibility, value and common-sense. If aliens landed on earth now and u gave them two choices; crappy compressed files with proprietary DRM or CD, I think you know which one they'd choose...
By SupremeCheddar, Fri 25 Jun 2004 09:23
Your assuming that aliens would listen to our music and not run-away holding their 5 arms to their 4 ears.
By p_motch, Fri 25 Jun 2004 17:36
Lol.
By cynicalbastard, Fri 25 Jun 2004 20:57
supergrin
By jasaiyajin, Sat 26 Jun 2004 16:50
I have a sad story, but isn't there always one with DRM related material. I know a girl, she owns her CDs and copies them onto her hard drive. However, she uses microsoft's WMA encoded file types without realizing that there is a protection scheme involved. Now, she had a system upgrade that deleted her old encrypted rights to play her music, and without an internet to renew her license. Now, the ~20 CDs she backed up are sitting around on her hard drive without her knowing why they aren't working. She is not the smartest PC user, but that is my point: there are tons of people that do not understand what is going on in the computer that they own. I have met several that cannot comprehend a file type extension's worth. Point is: as long as computer users are unaware of the computer laws and technology at an in-depth level, people who are aware will use that to their advantage to control the many that are not aware. Personally, DRM is a waste of money, specifically my money, that will be and is installed in present and future technology and passed on to the consumer through the consumers ever decreasing wallet. With this kind of conduct from corporations, digital media has a parasite on it's back that is taking over until it has sucked it's host for all it has. Hey, we're all rich and stupid, that's why we want DRM, because we are not smart enough to go to the store and purchase media that is $20+ for one or two songs for example.supergrin

Name: Email:



Your comment:

Receive notification on new comments?