Apple Inc. settles trademark lawsuit with The Beatles
Posted on 06/02/07 12:37 by Seán Byrne                             
Apple Inc. settles trademark lawsuit with The Beatles

Apple Inc., the maker of Macintosh computers and the popular iPod series has finally settled its trademark dispute with The Beatles label Apple Corps Ltd. over the use of the Apple logo and name.  The settlement gives Apple Inc. ownership over the Apple name and logo in return for them to license out the trademark to Apple Corps for them to continue using it.  Each side has agreed to pay its own legal costs, although it is unclear if either had to pay any settlements to the other.  However, a senior research analyst estimates Apple Inc. paid The Beatles $50 million to $100 million for the rights of the Apple name and logo. 

So far, The Beatles has not made any of its music available yet via iTunes or any other online music service, although industry analysts predict that there may already be plans to make The Beatles' music available online.  Steve Jobs is a huge Beatles fan, long wanting to have its music made available on iTunes and has even made use of The Beatles Music and album art when Apple unveiled the iPhone at the Macworld Conference.

This has been the third trademark lawsuit so far between the two.  The first lawsuit was in 1979 over trademark infringement, where Apple Inc. agreed to settle with Apple Corps in 1981 for $80,000 agreeing to never enter the music business.  All went well until Apple Inc. got into trouble over its Apple Macintosh's MIDI interface, so in 1991, Apple Inc. paid $26.5 million for rights to the Apple logo for selling computers and software and for Apple Corps to use the logo for producing and selling music.  In 2003, not only was Apple selling already its iPod series, they also started an online music store, which breached the 1991 settlement.   Last May, a British judge ruled that it was permitted to use of the Apple's logo in association with its iTunes store and not the music.

Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By Ginsu Victim, Tuesday 06 February 2007 14:34
Apple's doing dirty business. The logos are different and everyone knows who had it first. Now, when you agree not to get into the music business, you agree NOT TO GET INTO THE MUSIC BUSINESS. Am I a Beatles fan? Why, can't you tell?
By Waethorn, Tuesday 06 February 2007 17:49
let's just play a little game shall we? lets play: "Where would Apple be now without the iPod?" Stick Out Tongue sorry Apple, but you slamming Microsoft for paying Universal is coming back to b!tch-slap you in the face. you couldn't succeed in the computer industry, so just give it up already.
By ICCAFSN, Tuesday 06 February 2007 23:58
This isn't that related, but I know there are many Apple-bashers in the CDFreaks community because of their FairPlay DRM technology. Here's their stance on the current state of DRM music. http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/
By Bobverens, Wednesday 07 February 2007 00:46
Despite the sense Apple's "position" might make, Jobs' knows darn well that the Big Four will not abandon DRM anytime soon. This statement is his way of answering the critics and the foreign regulatory bodies who criticize iTunes/iPod for lack of interoperability with competing products. He argues that his system would be open if it weren't for DRM, which he'd rather not involve himself with anyway. DRM doesn't improve his customers' satisfaction in any way, and it increases passed-through costs to boot. It's a purely rhetorical gesture. Nothing more. puke
By heystoopid, Wednesday 07 February 2007 23:21
Who really cares , for all the Beatles music would have been in public domain by now, if it wasn't for the fact that in 1998 Sony Bono foisted upon the unsuspecting world the evil DMCA act , which has been used and abused since that date!
Name: Email:



Your comment:

Receive notification on new comments?