Call/Recall working on 1TB optical disc
Posted on 29/05/08 00:19 by Seán Byrne                             
Call/Recall working on 1TB optical disc

Now that Blu-ray has become the dominant disc format for high definition content, the company Call/Recall, which is in partnership with the Nichia Corporation of Japan, has announced it is developing a 1TB optical disc and drive as a next-generation format after Blu-ray.  To help reduce costs, the optical drive uses mostly standard components similar to in a Blu-ray drive apart from the use of a fluid-filled lens and 200 to 250 disc recording layers using Rhodamine-type dye. 

Unlike existing optical drives, the focal length and profile can be changed by the drive varying the amount of fluid in the lens, thus enabling it to read multiple layers.  The drive uses the company's patented 2-photon 3D optical technology and features a transfer rate of around 100MB/s, which is five times that of InPhase's holographic drives.  It will also be backwards compatible with Blu-ray discs.

Call/Recall began working on the 1TB prototype for use with Nichia's blue-violet laser diodes in December 2007 and has become successful in completing tests in March this year.  While Call/Recall may not sound like a familiar name, the company was founded in 1987 and mainly dealt with researching high capacity optical storage technologies and solutions for military and commercial customers.  Nichia on the other hand is a well known maker of blue and white LEDs and also has co-developed the blue-violet laser diodes with Sony for use in Blu-ray drives.

Unlike InPhase's pricey 300GB solution targeted at enterprise storage, Call/Recall says it will target its technology at consumers, where they expect high capacity blue-violet laser-based media to grow rapidly after the analogue broadcast shutoff, since high definition content requires more storage capacity for recordings.  So far, there is no mention of availability, although a period of 2010 to 2011 is suggested depending on quickly the company can overcome all its obstacles. 

Further details can be read in this source article on The Register.

Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By Crabbyappleton, Thursday 29 May 2008 03:26
CrabbyappletonNow- this has promise in todays market. Especially if it can compete with SSD and maybe even against HDD. Smilie Let's hope this is what they are aiming at and can sell these devices UNENCUMBERED WITH DRM at a competitive price to the aforementioned alternatives. Smilie For the love of everything holy- leave Hollywood out of the loop on this one- please!
This message was edited at: 29-05-2008 03:27
By Ian@CDRLabs.com, Thursday 29 May 2008 06:12
Ian@CDRLabs.comDidn't Call/Recall announce this back in November? http://www.call-recall.com/news.html
By Crabbyappleton, Thursday 29 May 2008 11:47
CrabbyappletonPosted by Ian@CDRLabs.com on Thursday 29 May 2008 06:12 "Didn't Call/Recall announce this back in November? http://www.call-recall.com/news.html" Didn't you just answer your own question by posting the very link you were "wondering" about? What's yer point?? *rolls eyes*
By Ian@CDRLabs.com, Thursday 29 May 2008 13:58
Ian@CDRLabs.comWow.. you truly are a crabby apple. Wink
By Crabbyappleton, Thursday 29 May 2008 14:45
CrabbyappletonAnswer the question Ian...what is the point? I don't get it.
This message was edited at: 29-05-2008 14:57
By CDan, Thursday 29 May 2008 16:04
CDanSeems like a big waste, to me, to bother developing an optical competitor to hard drives. And one with slower performance. By the time this gets off the ground, optical formats in general will be pretty much dead. Suppose you want to access a file that's on layer #150 of this disc, it'll take all day just to access it.
By DukeNukem, Thursday 29 May 2008 17:20
DukeNukem"200 to 250 disc recording layers" Are they fracking serious? Why in the world do we need a 1 TB disc? Even I don't have that much porn... and I have ALOT of porn. DukeNukem... creeping you out ever since I got off the boat.
This message was edited at: 29-05-2008 17:22
By HerculesBeast, Thursday 29 May 2008 18:28
Lets say we put one TB of data on the disc and for some reason the disc cannot be properly read. Discs do sometimes develop read back problems. We would be so screwed. Hard-drives are more reliable.
By Crabbyappleton, Thursday 29 May 2008 21:13
CrabbyappletonWell, I think for archiving it has a use. Still, it all boils down to price per megabyte.
By EZT (guest), Thursday 29 May 2008 23:32
It is only useful for archiving IF it is reliable. Having 200-250 layers is really scary. I would not trust it for archiving. It still seems today that tape is the most reliable backup media.
By u_n_s97, Friday 30 May 2008 00:39
200 layers... I just wish double later media worked so perfectly... but it did not. So they come up with 200 layers. Excellent. Burning and wasting the data, time and cash. Great combination. puke
By YourPersonalGeek (guest), Friday 06 June 2008 01:39
What happens if your kid takes it out of the drive to play their favorite game and leaves it laying face down on the floor next to your PC. How many of those 250 layers would be scratched up. Ouch!
By Ivan_PSP (guest), Tuesday 24 June 2008 14:01
Well the more capacity the better. I hope they release it soon i love disc like that to store videos. I already got a Blu-ray Disc writer/burner i hope this works there lol. Sony still the best.
Name: Email:



Your comment:

Receive notification on new comments?