Camcorder pirates still having effect on the movie industry
Posted on 10/12/05 17:05 by Dan Bell                             
Camcorder pirates still having effect on the movie industry

There is tremendous financial pressure for the movie studios to do something to counter camcorder pirates, especially when coupled with rising market costs and flattening DVD movie sales.  Last summer, Disney CEO Robert Iger went public with his wish to see the theatrical to DVD window eliminated. Quickly, he was flailed by criticism from theater owners and has since softened his stance. However, now Time Warner CEO Richard Parsons has declared to reporters in Los Angeles last week that the eventual collapse of the delay or window system is inevitable. It does seem a radical approach to counter economic pressures for the studios this way and there are even those in the industry that think it may be the wrong way to go.

One man that feels this way is Fox Filmed Entertainment co-chairman Jim Gianopulos. His concern is that a movie's box office gross is needed as a barometer of sorts, in order to properly set the licensing fees during the subsequent DVD distribution phase. It is his feeling that without this information, the studios might just be cutting their own throats.

In the meantime, it is interesting to read what's simultaneously going on behind the scenes, as the industry struggles to determine their next best move. There was an organized push in the past months in the form of a series of proposals to the DVD Copy Control Association, to modify future DVD players with a new watermarking system that would stop the playback of films from camcorder pirates. 

The idea is that a camcorder operated surreptitiously in a theater would unavoidably capture the watermark and pass it on to any DVD burned from that copy. If a DVD player detected the mark, it would refuse to play the disc.

Hardware makers, not surprisingly, are less than keen on the idea. While they've accepted playback control for next-generation formats, they have no interest in going back and retrofitting the older format when margins on standard-definition DVD players are already paper thin.

To sweeten the pot, the studios have offered to drop the requirement that hardware makers implement region coding in future DVD players.

The irony there is that region coding is a system the studios insisted on to protect the international theatrical window. Now, they're willing to forgo it in order to protect the domestic window.

Unfortunately for the studios, the hobbling measure of DVD of region coding is so easily circumvented, that the suggestion to drop it as an enticement to add another system was rejected. It turns out it wasn't much of a bargaining chip in the eyes of the hardware makers. So the search goes on for the best solution to profit losses for the studios.

Source: Video Business

Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By Ginsu Victim, Saturday 10 December 2005 17:58
I don't know anyone who downloads CAM movies. I know that for me, if it's not a screener, I can't be bothered with it.
By JamesL, Saturday 10 December 2005 21:14
Endless DRM on camcorders and disc players is not going to stop or even limit the flood of piracy. They can add all the watermarking in the world but it will make no difference as the pirates will just use current gen camcorders that have no such watermarks. Simultaneous, or near simultaneous (the box office could have an exclusive for the launch weekend perhaps), is the way forward IMHO.
By pinkish, Saturday 10 December 2005 21:23
i've watched (very few) CAMs. i'm not always keen on waiting for the (dvd)screener. most recent movies i've seen were in TS format, where the video is an improved (or the same) version as the CAM, but the sound is captured from the source (not audience sound).
By Mordorr, Saturday 10 December 2005 21:50
MordorrNo wonder! € 5,00 to watch a movie in cinemaEmbarrassment... It`s better at home loveit
By I Have Piles, Saturday 10 December 2005 23:48
Only retards would be happy with quality that shit anyway. Nothing beats a good film at the cinema, you still get people getting up for a piss fair enough but the sound is stunning and it sure beats even the best big screen plasmas.
By crustyteacup, Sunday 11 December 2005 00:32
crustyteacupthe quality at a cinema is not that good, they should use digital projectors, get far better quality. and its expensive, and i hate when people talk on their phone, and chavs who don't shut up, and when the chavs have it off.
By JamesL, Sunday 11 December 2005 11:35
>>>> Nothing beats a good film at the cinema <<<< Depends on the quality of your home cinema. Generally I prefer watching movies at home as 1) I always seated in the 'sweet spot' for the sound 2) I never have anyone sitting in front of me or getting up during the movie 3) Nobody smokes, uses a mobile, has screaming kids etc etc 4) I have the beer fridge instantly available 5) I can eat what I want during the film ...so all in all I much prefer watching movies at home. Maybe that's just me though...
By Kinvig, Sunday 11 December 2005 22:18
And also find the few rows of seats at the front are way too close to the screen so if ya dont make it early on a popular movie its tuff
By darwin03, Monday 12 December 2005 15:34
Hers's a suggestion, GO AFTER THE TRUE PIRATES WHO COPY YOUR FILMS FOR PURE PROFIT. Instaed of going after people who make backup copies of the movies they have purchased and in a lot of countries (well despite the greedy film companies efforts of buying Politicians and laws to ensure people do not have rights to use what they have purchased, Isn't greed good the movie companies say, while alianating their customer base. And Politicians and Political parties saying how good is this extra Gold mine of cash we are getting from the Movie comapanies to introduce the laws they want (the Rich Movie Comapinies.) and let's trample the consumers rights for the sake of the enormous amounts of undeclared cash we will recieve despite the fact that consumers have rights under the law. If only the law (GOVERNMENTS) and movie and music recording studios concentrated on the TRUE PIRATES who do download and copy for PFOFIT and deal in mass quantities, and come into the current timezone rather than being stuck in the early 20th century. But then again when they offer a product which most do not want to buy because it is crap, and most would only accept if it was free or the peddlers of crap paid them to actually listen to or take it is no wonder they are buying Politicians and laws for large sums of money to ensure they can ,ake people pay for thier crap nowdays. After all if you provide a product which people want to buy people will, if you provide a product which is shite people will not. But then again they see more money in sueing people than in providing a good product, and it is less financially lucrative to pursue the true pirates rather than concentrate on ordibary people who they can make a lot more money from seeing how there is a lot more ordinary people to real true pirates!! Yes the Dinosaurs died out and went extinct and I am sure the Music and movie studios current model of business will do the same unless they accept change because they are acting like dinosaurs.
By nailzer, Wednesday 14 December 2005 12:06
With what Hollywood is putting out these days I'll wait to watch it at home on my 16:9 plasma HDTV.supergrin
Name: Email:



Your comment:

Receive notification on new comments?