Clone CD author about the cracks.....
Found on the forum:
Next: Intrested in DivX information ?
Previous: Metallica to sue Napster
I tried it, it doesn't work fully. Settings aren't saved (as in Demo Mode), but the "nag" requesters are gone. Trying a simulated write to my HP9210i threw an exception.
BTW, this is a technically very skilled crack attempt, I am - in a way - impressed.
To patch CloneCD in memory after all the CRC checks are done is indeed a cool idea.
But don't expect this attack to work in the future :-)
|
Next: Intrested in DivX information ?Previous: Metallica to sue NapsterWant to submit your own news? Click here
Posted by Unknown on Saturday 15 April 2000 17:46
This one is for olly or olli..whatever:-) If ur still using Armadillo get a live. I think u can do better then using a commercial protection. Write ur own PE crypter and use some RSA for ur serials. RSA is more pain in the ass for us crackers...if u use it correct 
Like all commerical protections they will not stand for a long time Programs protected by armadillo can easily be unpacked completely, like we did with our crack for Armadillo v1.77.
And anti loader code will not work too...
Well just want to say this..
Greetz,
Wax
Like all commerical protections they will not stand for a long time
Programs protected by armadillo can easily be unpacked completely, like we did with our crack for Armadillo v1.77.
And anti loader code will not work too...
Well just want to say this..
Greetz,
Wax
Posted by Unknown on Saturday 15 April 2000 17:47
my friend destroyer cracked the 1.0.2.2 with sice...now i've always have the serial number...if not...we crack it again
Posted by Unknown on Sunday 16 April 2000 13:47
I don't think it is armadillo.
It is ASPROTECT.
"If it work, it can be defeated" G-Rom dixit)
It is ASPROTECT.
"If it work, it can be defeated" G-Rom dixit
)
Posted by Unknown on Monday 17 April 2000 20:01
Hey, don't you think Olly's work is really great ? I think everyone does, even if it's not perfect (yet..) . We should respect his work, because without him & CloneCD:
a) too many protections
b) too much time lost on every CD, and you have to use patches too !
c) a big headache for every new S**edisc version, etc.
So, what's the point ? Just pay for the program - like I already did, obviously - and thank him for the good work.
My two cents is that the more time Olly spends on the protection, the less he spends on the Cl**eCd itself ! Just think about a future version where you can drag&drop YOUR protecting schema without losing precious time editing cue files...
Remember, what Cl**eCD permits was a dream only one year ago !
a) too many protections
b) too much time lost on every CD, and you have to use patches too !
c) a big headache for every new S**edisc version, etc.
So, what's the point ? Just pay for the program - like I already did, obviously - and thank him for the good work.
My two cents is that the more time Olly spends on the protection, the less he spends on the Cl**eCd itself ! Just think about a future version where you can drag&drop YOUR protecting schema without losing precious time editing cue files...
Remember, what Cl**eCD permits was a dream only one year ago !
Related news
Related reviews/articles
Get the latest news via RSS 