Critics say no to possible FCC digital TV anti piracy laws
Posted on 28/10/03 06:37 by Dan Bell                             
Critics say no to possible FCC digital TV anti piracy laws

Feast your eyes on the image below. That is the portrait of FCC chairman Michael Powell and he doesn't look like a happy camper in this shot. I'm not a physician, but I fear his discomfort could be gastrointestinal in nature. Or maybe he heard someone is tearing up the world sharing an episode of "Jackass" I don't know. Too bad, as he will be at the helm when federal regulators meet later this week . Possibly to adopt rules meant to keep people from copying digital broadcasts of television shows and movies for distribution on the Internet. As we reported earlier, this could also warrant the need to purchase new equipment to avail ourselves of this hardware hobbling tech.

Fortunately there is some opposition.

But the proposed regulations, which the Federal Communications Commission may adopt this week, have been criticized by consumer advocacy groups, and others, who say they would not effectively prevent piracy but could curtail the legitimate copying of television programs and might render current consumer electronics equipment obsolete.

The companies that designed the technical elements of the rules include important equipment makers like Hitachi, Intel, Matushita, Sony and Toshiba. But some other equipment makers, among them Phillips Electronics, say the new rules may be anticompetitive by requiring all manufacturers to use the technologies developed by the group - and quite possibly also pay licensing fees.

The critics have suggested that the rules will face court challenges on the grounds that the agency lacks the authority to issue them

Well, how will "important equipment makers" like it if folks get wind of this prior to the holiday buying season and decide to hold off a few years while the FCC gets the kinks out of it's legislation? Somebody must have thought of that, due to this hastily penned note from one of the primary provocateurs of this new legal smackdown.

"The broadcast flag will not obsolete the some 50 million DVD playback devices currently in consumer homes," Jack Valenti, the president and chief executive of the Motion Picture Association of America, wrote in a letter last Wednesday to Michael K. Powell, the F.C.C. chairman.

Whew! What a relief Jack, thank goodness your calling the shots!

Source: nytimes.com

Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By theTAO, Tuesday 28 October 2003 08:39
I already submitted my oppositions to this "broadcast flag" rule to the FCC, but recently had a conversation with a friend who works in the DVD industry. He argued that (knowing public demands) networks and broadcasters would be suicidal to start copy-protecting everything, and that the flag would be used only for "special events". I argued back that we have a number of recent laws, written in such broad manners that they could (and in some cases already have) seriously restricted the freedoms of average Americans. (Two obvious examples are the Patriot Act and the DMCA. cry ) I'm getting wise to this style of lawmaking, and becoming increasingly hesitant to hand somebody a "gun" unless I know exactly where they'll point it. Congress can override FCC rules...but I wonder if they can also impeach an FCC Commissioner? Wink
By theTAO, Tuesday 28 October 2003 09:35
By Sherrif, Tuesday 28 October 2003 17:07
if they can ok the razing of a country on the basis of misinformation, halftruths and downright lies...I'm pretty sure they can impeach that porker..........but it will all depend on whose hand is on whose wallet..............cool
By jcsm2K3, Wednesday 29 October 2003 05:07
Hi! this is my first post here. First, forgive me my bad english. Anyway. I disagree with this FCC anti copy potection thing (hardware) on future digital tv's. I understand the need for buy new hardware (to accept this protetcion anti copy shit), but something i don't accept: It say u can copy ur tv show (or whatever) and it only plays on ur equipament (not plays on ur friend's equipament, for example, to "stop"piracy", DRM thing, stop p2p dls, whatever). But something is NOT GOD here: Let's take a example u buy this shit (equipament) next year (2004) and record a lot of ur favorite tv shows. Let's think this new equipament will stop working three years later (2007), after u have a LOT of ur favorite tv shows recorded. Let's think it's not interesting to repair this equipament (too much costly and new equipaments on the market is more powerfull and cheaper than repair work). Well, u'll buy this new equipament. But something will be wrong, the adorable tv shows u recorded for so long (3 years) will NOT run in this new equipament. Why ? Because this new equipament will not have the same internal serial/checksum that the older equipament have, and ur recorded tv digital shows are encripted/coded with the older internal serial number/checksum of ur older (broken) equipament. So, to prevent "piracy", u couldn't play ur tv shows on newer bought equipament! This is why i couldn't agree with this propused "protection" until they found an method that mantain ur rughts to watch again ur recorded tv shows, years later on newer equipament. Frown Jr
By CaFrow, Thursday 30 October 2003 00:34
Sounds like a copy protection that will not be very hard to break. I mean they can unlock the cable TV, Digital Cable and Satilite right now, so I am sure that a box will come out that will allow you to still record and you will have a hard time stopping people from making these in Taiwan and importing them here in the USA.
By theTAO, Thursday 30 October 2003 01:39
Agreed on all counts. Unfortunately, the shortsighted politicians don't see it that way, and such devices would technically be in violation of the DMCA and possibly other laws. Frown The media corporations would be all too happy to see people re-purchase their movies and music every so many years. Personally, I don't think anything short of an organized effort to vote Hollywood-friendly politicians out of office one-by-one (or a half-million people demonstrating in front of the FCC building) will make any difference. But getting rid of Bush would be a start.
Name: Email:



Your comment:

Receive notification on new comments?