DivX Guide on CDR Info
Posted on 04/04/00 18:35 by Maikel T
Source: CDR Info
On CDR Info you can find a complete guide on DivX.
This is the best way to convert DVD movies to (usually) a single CD. How can this be possible? With DivX codec we compress Video to mpeg4v3 and the sound to mp3 (or MS audio). This gives us the possibility to get MUCH better video and sound quality than VideoCD, at a smaller file size. A great way to backup those favourite DVD's you paid 30 bucks for.
|
more cdfreaks.com news
22:05
18:09
16:01
14:31
12:37
11:48
10:24
Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By
Unknown,
Wednesday 05 April 2000 02:24
Can you play them back in a DVD or VCD player, or can you at least use mediaplayer.
I guess, What are the playback options of this new format?
By
Unknown,
Wednesday 05 April 2000 02:28
Quite pompous words, that article was really a good laugh.
All this has been known and posted maybe more than 6 months ago in well informed sites (sorry guys but you are not well informed
). Actually the article suggests Flask (other programs have much less problems with sync) and fails to even provide some decent facts. You see, there are many little things in this conversion which can drive you crazy (like the follow the rabbit scenes), and this article was certainly not "a complete guide on Divx".
cdr info site with divx looks like an old virgin spinster who discovered missionary sex in her 60s and doesn't want to get off the bed
. Maybe they'll discover mpeg2 conversion a couple of years after...
Go to http://dvd.da.ru and their 10s of links and study with the masters!
By
Unknown,
Wednesday 05 April 2000 15:30
By
Unknown,
Wednesday 05 April 2000 15:58
The first to post online guides for vcd AND divx?????? Is this some kind of a joke?Where have you been living all this time? As I said, divx is known to the whole world for more than 6 months, with methods far more reliable and easier than Flask. I have been doing it all this time, the whole world has been doing it. And I have been doing VCD and video for years, thanks to guides posted on reliable video related sites. As a matter of fact, I challenge everyone to visit http://dvd.da.ru and its links to see real complete guides on the subject. Have I written my own faq you ask? I have participated the team efforts of the dvd community without fame being my priority.
Since this brings us to maturity, don't expect to learn about digital video from stuff written by people totally ignorant about the subject. Study with the masters and don't let your intelligence being insulted.
By
Unknown,
Wednesday 05 April 2000 18:49
do not break ppl works apart, help them to make it better !!!
oh and TD, here 2 the bug aof the date 
By
Unknown,
Friday 07 April 2000 03:00
i have ripped already 5 films
with divx mpeg4 ...very cool
By
Unknown,
Sunday 21 May 2000 04:14
I don't agree with Anonymous Coward. If you read the article is states that article is still in beta format. Instead of accusing cdrinfo you should try to write your own faq and post in web so we can also judje you.
FlaskMethod is the easiest method to do. It has some problems with Sync if you don't putt same fps in final project (as cdrinfo also states.) Also cdrinfo gives solution for sync problem.
cdrinfo was from the first sites in net which posted on-line guides for VCD,SVCD and divx. Really cannot undestand your problem..
By
Unknown,
Friday 30 June 2000 11:32
My PC has an ASUS 100mhz+ motherboard an AMD 500 MHZ chip with ATI AIW graphic card and 64MB RAM. I have used both Flask and MPEG2AVI to create a DivX CD or MPEG4 CD if you like. I have also downloaded the trailers from the Internet.
But 'not one' of these DivX plays with the same quality as a professional VCD! Maybe it's just that my computer can handle it, but you would think it could with the specifications I mentioned above.
Flask makes a slightly jerky image so MPEG2AVI tends to be better IMHO. But neither can make a DivX better than a VCD. The size may be twice that of a VCD but the image breaks up into block too often. The motion is 'slightly' more jerky too. Again I am willing to say it must be my machine.
Nick 