FireWire to become the 'Cinderella' interface?
Posted on 29/06/07 13:20 by Mike Kidd                             
FireWire to become the 'Cinderella' interface?
A report in arstechnica predicts that the FireWire (or IEEE 1394 standard) is on a rocky popularity road and may eventually shrink to a niche connection status, rather like SCSI.

This is unfortunate, because FireWire is technically superior to the Universal Serial bus. It has the ability to daisy-chain devices (which is why you see two FireWire sockets on most peripherals), it can allocate different bandwidths to devices on the same bus, which unlike the behaviour of USB means it doesn't all decrease to a crawl when a slower peripheral is attached. Furthermore, the FireWire bus speed allocation and functions are completely handled by the interface itself, whereas USB has to be dealt with by the CPU and therefore can be a significant drain on the whole computer performance.

So raw speed isn't everything, yet other factors are said to have influenced the demise of FireWire. Intel quickly integrated USB into its chipsets, whereas FireWire was left as an add-on in the form of cards. The relatively high royalties charged on merely having a FireWire port on a PC also initially dissuaded manufacturers from fitting it to their computers.

The end result after several years of USB cementing its place as a 'standard' peripherals interface, is that FireWire may probably only have its place in the non-PC arena, such as DV camcorders and standalone DVD recorders. There is the remote possibility that when high definition camcorders become more affordable and widely available, that there may be a small resurgence of interest in what may be the best interface to acquire such a high volume of data, reliably and quickly to a PC.

 

Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By pinkish, Fri 29 Jun 2007 14:05
all i can say is: TYPICAL!!! Frown
By Bekali (guest), Fri 29 Jun 2007 15:21
I don't understand these days the place of firewire, paralel, serial or PS2 connections. Frown I like the simple things, not loaded with useless interfaces. And if the peripheral require high speed, then exist eSATA connection, is faster. cool Almost forgot to mention the stupid FDD and PATA conection. clown
By neo1918, Sat 30 Jun 2007 01:57
"The relatively high royalties charged..." Could it be that had it not been for greedy royalties, this article would have been about the demise of USB instead of firewire? Better to sell a million for a little profit, than 1 for a big profit...
By Warped (guest), Sat 30 Jun 2007 18:14
There is also the superior firewire 800 which has never been implemented into m/boards and is only present on a few external hard disks. Could it be that firewire 800 has even higher royalties than the 400 standard? It\'s a shame this high speed interface may never take off!
By sidewinder33625, Sun 1 Jul 2007 20:36
Sort of like RDRAM.
By DonCatoli (guest), Mon 2 Jul 2007 08:00
The Asus P5AD2/E Premium mobos have FW800, but installing the drivers for FW800 disables the FW400 ports so it's completely useless for most users.
By T3R, Tue 3 Jul 2007 12:57
T3ReSATA doe not have power lines (it requires external supply).
By T3R, Tue 3 Jul 2007 13:00
T3ReSATA doe not have power lines (it requires external supply).
By Iblis (guest), Tue 3 Jul 2007 22:49
Just great Frown Add this to the fact that Vista doesn't support TCP/IP over Firewire and you can put a nail in the coffin.

Name: Email:



Your comment:

Receive notification on new comments?