Hollywood & BitTorrent author reach agreement to curb piracy
Posted on 23/11/05 00:00 by Seán Byrne                             
Hollywood & BitTorrent author reach agreement to curb piracy

Normally, it is quite common to hear about the music or movie industry shutting down websites that assist in helping to distribute copyrighted works.  However when it comes to BitTorrent, the most popular tool for distributing and downloading pirated movies, Hollywood has negotiated an agreement with the BitTorrent Software creator and designer, Bram Cohen that requires him to prevent his website, BitTorrent.com from finding pirated popular movies in an aim to frustrate consumers who try looking for pirated copies.

This agreement is not only welcomed by the entertainment industry, but also shows Cohen's reaction towards piracy and that the movie studios are more likely to make deals with him relating to movie downloading, such as to develop commercial tools for efficiently distributing movies without the current issues of BitTorrent.  Unfortunately, this move will not prevent consumers from using other websites to find pirated content.  Thanks to BKF for letting us know about this news on this forum thread.

WASHINGTON -- Hollywood negotiated an agreement Tuesday with the creator of BitTorrent software, popular for downloading pirated movies over the Internet, in a deal aimed at reducing illegal traffic in online films.

The agreement requires 30-year-old software designer Bram Cohen to prevent his Web site, bittorrent.com, from locating pirated versions of popular movies, effectively frustrating people who search for illegal copies of films, according to executives familiar with the deal.

These people spoke only on condition of anonymity because details of the agreement between the major studios and Cohen were being announced later Tuesday in Los Angeles.

As the author of BitTorrent never intended its software to be used for illegal file sharing, but instead as an efficient method of distributing large files without servers, it is not all that surprising to see him now trying to curb piracy, at least from his website.  Then again, for him this is better than effectively appearing to support it, not to mention what the movie industry would have done otherwise.  On the other hand, this will not be the end of BitTorrent either, since like eMule, if one tracker site is shutdown or agrees to block pirated content, one can use another.  However, for those who rely on the authors search engine to scan tracker sites, this will mean having to find an alternative or search each tracker site individually for what they are looking for. 

Feel free to discuss about BitTorrent and file sharing on our Music Download, Peer to Peer (P2P) & Legal Issues forum.

Source: Washington Post

Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By lui_gough, Wednesday 23 November 2005 01:08
This isn't really a big deal, but I guess it doesn't hurt too much
By freonchill, Wednesday 23 November 2005 01:13
i read another article earlier in the day saying that they [MPAA + BRAM] where joining forces to bring a new "DISTRIBUTION METHOD" to the people, that both the studios and the people could agree on what happened to that !? now i know that since the palet of the public has been whet w/ the ability to watch movies for free, its going to have to be a compromise on both sides: MPAA new methods and lower prices; PUBLIC w/ well what we have always done - be entertained...
By Rhelic, Wednesday 23 November 2005 18:35
I'm surprised, after reading this article I was expecting a bunch of posts calling Cohen a sellout. Just a note... people should be happy that good technology teams up with the RIAA/MPAA as normaly the only time you see an article about the RIAA/MPAA and P2P or BT it's only about filing lawsuits or shutting down a site.
[edited by Rhelic on 23.11.2005 18:35]
By yronnen, Wednesday 23 November 2005 20:19
So at the end, not only will we have to pay for getting movies from the web, our computers will also serve as file distribution servers using our own bandwith. Nice, now they won't even need to pay for file servers.
By heystoopid, Wednesday 23 November 2005 23:16
Hmm, a true cheap distribution method, but given the past crop and current summer and the upcoming lame turkey/box office dog movies released via the Major Hollywood Studio's these days, every cent in profit is desperately needed for these dogs. But then again since all open source projects like BitTorrent come complete with source code, it would not take rocket scientist, to recompile, and deactivate or disable any gatekeeper isp blocker control code incorporated therein to stop piracy! Oh well, at least with the current hollywood management types brains are a true optional extra! What can one say, other than the fact that most new hollywood movies are now all about special effects, weak ineffectual plotlines, and ham in acting so bad, that even after a hundred retakes, it still defies reason ! Me, if Hollywood, slid into the sea in the great upcoming L.A. quake tomorrow, it would be of no great loss to the world! cool
By thyfleshconsumed, Wednesday 23 November 2005 23:18
They will need file servers for the seeds or if the movie is not well distributed on the network. However yes, they will not need as many servers and bandwidth. I don't really mind as long as I'm not forced to keep my connection open for longer than it takes to download the movie and if the price is right. However I would think that MPAA will want to charge the same price for online distribution as netflix or blockbuster does in which case the deal is dead, at least to me.
By mcheu, Wednesday 23 November 2005 23:50
I fail to see how this changes anything at all. From the beginning, Cohen has said that bit torrent wasn't intended for pirating stuff, and his site has never hosted pirate torrents or trackers. That's a bit like having a Catholic priest sign a contract saying won't worship Satan. Kind of pointless.
By bkf, Thursday 24 November 2005 00:01
bkfI think it's known as a Symbolic Gesture
By jbailey8, Thursday 24 November 2005 04:01
Unless I'm misunderstanding something here, it looks like to me, that the studios are thinking about a 'special' version bittorrent. If I'm right, that won't work, since like stated in the above posts, the sources are readily available to anyone who wants them. Also, you simply don't have to use a given torrent client if you don't want to.... cool
Name: Email:



Your comment:

Receive notification on new comments?