Surfing the web today I found an interesting article at NME, which has reported results of a recent survey: It seems that CD discs will die in 5 years:
According to the survey, published by mobile phone nextwork 3, 85 per cent of under 24s believe that downloading music can help save the planet by reducing the amount of packaging, waste, and carbon emissions involved in producing and transporting CDs to shops.
Even if the ecological point of view is certainly correct, I'm not sure that this survey can be reliable, because all downloaded music must be stored in some place, and very often this place is a CD disc.
Moreover, people under 24 is not a reliable sampling of the entire population, and I'm sure that there are many people here at CDFreaks that will not agree with this survey ;)
In my opinion CDs are still very good media, and in many cases CDs proved to be more reliable than DVD discs. What concerns me is that CD manufacturers could take too seriously such surveys and stop CD media production.
Next: A new tool for MP3 players from McAfee
Previous: HELIOS H4000 HD Upscaling DVD Player launches in US & Europe





It would save so much material and reduce emissions etc. I think the whole "wanting a physical copy with boxart" argument is getting a little childish now. I changed my entire collection of music into MP3 format, sold off the physical discs and i buy from legal download services. Give me the same thing for films for a decent price and i'll do the same for those to.


CD/DVD are cheaper, still cheaper then hard drives and longer lasting. We still need a cheap backup media for computers, and DVD is good for that, but bluRay and HDDVD are better, they to are optical discs. Point being that optical media will ALWAYS out price any other storage media. Then we have sound and video plus speed, Not everyone in the USA has High speed internet or can get high speed. I am in a decent populated are and we have no high speed. I also am not a big fan up bad sounding compressed audio, so i prefer the physical cd, however i do like Mp3 for the fact that it is portable and good for work outs and the car. Now if i could get my CD collection uncompressed in a ipod that would be a blessing in it self, but the idea of no optical media in the future is very far away. I like the idea of ipod based devices and are all for them, we just need 1TB sized devices for audio and video.
And consumer electronics need to get more computer based too so you have the compatibility. I saw a pioneer DVD recorder which has a 160GB hard drive, what is cool about this device is it lets you store Divx and Mp3 files to its hard drive from a USB connection, and then play it from there, no need for CD/DVD discs, if more electronics would do this, then it would be possible to eliminate optics, providing HDs would get cheaper and more reliable. God knows the speed is better. Then for people that cant download, you could have them use a reusable chip or RW based disc, go to the store and burn/write the content you want to the media and then bring home to transfer to your computer and home electronics. But when you talk about low income people. this then causes problems since most of them don't have computers. All of us here always forget that not every person in the world has a computer, and when it comes to Audio/video based stuff the walmart $300 spacial computer just doesn't cut it. Computers are still to expensive when it comes to all the software you have to buy to run all these media files. So it will be quite some time before optical media ever disappears completely.




I hope when you say CD Media, you mean pressed (store bought) CDs, and not CD-Rs. CD-Rs are only going UP in price!


I mean lets face it, most users won't need lossless stuff. Sure its brillant to have a CD quality album on your PC, but i settle for mp3 as my collection is already 30gb in size, i would hate to think about what size it would be if it was all lossless!
But good point about burning re-writable discs in store, i forgot about that. I'm not against optical media, its a life saver sometimes.




Servers for downloading still pollute the environment, the question is which one is worse?


I don't think everyone who's spent $$$ on their CD collections over the years is ready to buy the replacement technology.
And what is that technology ? What device will replace a CD player in a living room stereo system where there is no computer and no network/wifi ?


That survey is the most ridiculous thing as if everyone under 24 is now part of the "Green Party" which is certainly not acurate.
Sonce Blu-ray and HD just came out it's about that time again to start with "CD Media" which they have to before picking on "DVD".
It took a long time for floppy's to completely die out, and with so many "Redbook" players still in use it is doubtful CD media is going to die out anytime soon.













That's why SACD never found its way.


As the floppy is at last dead (well nearly)what device will be used to boot up the computer and supply software?




Most studios and musicians feel that 44.1Khz, 16-bit, stereo channel audio is still quite high on the quality list.
As "crustyteacup" above replied, they have sold off their entire physical CD collection, and burnt it to mp3...all I can say is why, why, why?
I want something to hold and treasure for my music buying dollar! (not to mention quality!)
I do agree that music/audio will evolve again, but it will take a system that is designed for film and music to all play on the one system, before that really happens!
Cassettes are only just mid next year being fazed out at the major plants (here in Australia), and that is a non optical disc format, whereas CD is, so it will always be backwards compatible and therefore will be catered to for a long, long time!
For the record, I'm a 27yo, who only downloads rare live tracks or similar, and will never download a full album in place of having the physical thing!
Just my opinion!





