Some of world's biggest and best known music firms are the latest targets for
The news worried investors with shares falling in
The allegations centre on how the music industry gets music on the radio and how broadcasters choose the music to play. Broadcasters are banned from taking goods or cash for playing songs on the station but the music industry has got round this by paying independent promoters as a way of sidestepping this law. The independent promoters then pay radio stations an annual fee for the future play lists that the station will be using.
Mr Spitzer alleges this agreement seriously damages the chances independent artists that aren't part of a large music corporation that can pay these fees.
| Some of the world's biggest music firms are the latest The firms have been asked to hand over contracts, invoices and other documents as part of an inquiry into how songs make it on to radio station play lists. EMI confirmed it was cooperating with the probe but stressed it had a policy banning unlawful promotion practices. It added it had no reason to believe that there will be any material financial impact on the company. Mr Spitzer's reputation is such that shares fell in London and Paris. EMI, whose artists include Coldplay, Kylie Minogue and Radiohead, lost nearly 2% in London on Friday. Shares in Vivendi Universal, which owns Universal, were trading down nearly 1.91% in Paris. Mr Spitzer is currently going after some of the biggest names in the insurance industry, and has previously tangled with Wall Street and the mafia. Sony BMG declined to comment on the report while Warner Music and Universal did not immediately return calls. According to the New York Times, broadcasters are banned from taking cash or goods in return for playing songs. The record industry, however, has long paid independent promoters as a way of skirting around this legislation, the paper alleges. Independent promoters then pay radio stations an annual fee, not - they say - for playing a certain song, but for advance copies of play lists, the New York Times explained. Mr Spitzer is said to allege that the agreement with the promoters severely hampers the chances of those artists who cannot afford to employ their services. |
Nice to see the music industry on the end of a subpoena instead of their customers for once.
Source: BBC