Net music mired in marketing woes
Posted on 05/06/02 15:48 by Jan Willem                             
Net music mired in marketing woes

Music is one of the key elements on the internet of today, millions of people share and download music of the internet and the record labels are trying to stop them, because they share copyrighted works for free.

The consumers however have not much if they legally want to download digital music, they have options, but most of them are in no way an alternative, or better then a CD and can certainly not compete with the filesharing networks available today.

Also the company Emusic.com is struggling and it seems the company can't really work out a good method to market their services. They tried to work with hardware companies to bundle their services, but it isn't really working out very well:


The company, which Vivendi Universal bought last year, has cut a host of bundling deals, including a pioneering agreement in 2000 that packaged two months of free, unlimited downloads from its site along with Hewlett-Packard's CD-Writer recordable drives. That arrangement, which lasted only three months, was followed by a string of others, including a second HP deal as well as pacts with Iomega, Sonicblue and Gateway.

So much for synergies. In two years, EMusic has signed up just 50,000 paid users for its menu of some 100,000 independent label tracks, according to the company, a trivial number compared with the ranks of Web surfers drawn to the free file-swapping services it competes against. LimeWire, one of the most prominent versions of Gnutella-based software, reported that in one day, it reached 300,000 people.

EMusic General Manager Steve Grady admitted some of the deals didn't work, but he defended them in general as useful experiments and, in some cases, as a cost-effective alternative to mass marketing. When EMusic was an independent company with a small marketing budget, he said, it didn't have the money to conduct tests for its service. The collaborative deals, according to Grady, enabled it to know that every dollar it spent was going toward a subscriber coming into the service.

Grady admits that some partnerships didn't meet the company's expectations. A partner might have a million customers, but if it doesn't deliver them in a way that is "compelling or visible," it doesn't help sell the service.


Legal online music sharing companies also need to spend way too many time on making deals with the conservative record labels that are not really keen on working together. It just seems that the free market still doesn't really excist in the music industry. Read the entire story on Cnet.com here.

Source: Cnet.com

Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By andyman210, Wednesday 05 June 2002 19:00
The Industry ( a.k.a. RIAA ) is so reluctant to give up their current marketing model that they are letting an opportunity slip away out of their grasp. People aren't opposed to paying a FAIR price for a DECENT product but the industry has yet to offer it to us. This is not the time to procranstinate or to launch lengthy lawsuits in a futile attempt to stem the wave of filesharing....its time to jump on the bandwagon and participate in a meaningful way. Open up your vaults and let people see what is available...at a FAIR price of course...and in an acceptable format. Silent movies ... 78's ... and the Pony Express all disappeared...and so will you if you don't adapt.
By Sherrif, Thursday 06 June 2002 07:22
Goes to show thst the policies of the music industry pratts is hurting the legal web companies in their attempt to monopolise. I wonder what their motto is...mebbe "May a thousand camels pass through the eye of a needle before we see the light"....or summat like dat ...:7
Name: Email:



Your comment:

Receive notification on new comments?