Tennessee rejects RIAA mandatory fee to schools
Posted on 02/05/04 19:06 by Quakester2000                             
Tennessee rejects RIAA mandatory fee to schools

Over 180,000 students in Tennessee can rest easy knowing they will not be slapped with an RIAA music tax thanks to the Tennessee Board of Regents.  The group rejected the idea of slapping students with a mandatory fee for the Napster music download service.  The fee would have kept the RIAA away from 45 schools represented by the board but added to costs of university fees.  The board decided that 99c per student a month was not reasonable and not worth it to solve a very insignificant problem of illegally downloaded music.  Without this deal schools who sign up in Tennessee will not get as good a deal as the University of Rochester which is subsidised by RIAA but the Tennessee board don't really care as the money they saved can go to better education and other more important problems.  As pointed out by The Register students want better education not where Britney spears next vacation will be.

 

Napster LogoMore than 180,000 students will be free of a Napster/RIAA music tax thanks to the Tennessee Board of Regents.The group has rejected a proposal to slap students with a  mandatory fee for the Napster music download service. The agreement with Napster would have kept the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) off the backs of the 45 schools represented by the Tennessee Board of Regents but add to already massive uni costs.

Despite bullying by the RIAA, Tennessee has decided that a $ 9.99 per student/per month fee is too high a price to pay to solve a not terribly important problem."The mandatory RIAA LOGOfee that was part of the Tennessee plan, coupled with the perception that illegal downloading doesn"t pose a specific problem for the schools, prompted system officials to table the idea, said Bob Adams, the Regents" vice chancellor for business and finance," according to the Associated Press. So far, not a single school that we are aware of has agreed to pay full price for a music download service, as an option to push students away from downloading copyrighted files on peer-to-peer networks.

You can get the full story over at The Register.  As usual the RIAA tries to bully schools into signing up for services that they don't really require.  Schools want to spend money on extra educational facilities and books and as pointed out IT costs will go up if students are made to sign up to these services.  Of course wasting money on music downloading services is not going to get the student the best education is it?

Source: The Register

Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By p_motch, Sun 2 May 2004 20:32
At the RIAA's pace, we should be able to start an accurate countdown of the days left til they fall flat on their face. They just don't get it. Supporting a failing business model and going about change all the wrong way will only send them failing faster. FREE THE MUSIC
By freonchill, Sun 2 May 2004 21:23
for once the board of regents have done something RIGHT! as a student down here - its about time they got off there corporate/beaurocratic a$$es and did something for us [students] rather than just giving us another fee; we currently have [technology fee, printing fee (which as of end of the semester now adds per-printing charge ontop of a semesterly fee), campus fee, "clean fuels fee", among others that i have forgotten ALL ON TOP OF TUITION (not to mention that some classes (labs) have another added "facility FEE")
By Crabbyappleton, Sun 2 May 2004 21:45
Crabbyappletonfreonchill -they need all that money for the football team!! Frown It's about time someone did something about all these rising education costs. It is horrible.
[edited by Crabbyappleton on 02.05.2004 21:46]
By SupremeCheddar, Sun 2 May 2004 22:26
I wonder what kind of dirt someone has on the Board of Regents that would make them not take the RIAA's dirty bribe money?
By slacker6, Sun 2 May 2004 23:13
Univeristy of Tennesse alum in the house... GO VOLS So the Board of Regents decided to pull their collective heads out of their ass' for once. Still doesn't make up for some of the stupid shit they've pulled in the past but a step in the right direction for sure.
By zver, Mon 3 May 2004 00:32
ten$$ a month..What a robbery..devildevil
By sorti, Mon 3 May 2004 01:33
sortiI wonder how long till the RIAA does a raid because the protection money was not paid.
By Sherrif, Mon 3 May 2004 02:59
EGAD !!!!.....beaurocrats doing the right thing....good to see someone bitchslappin' the RIAA..(even if it is only with a wet tram ticket)........cool
By slacker6, Mon 3 May 2004 04:10
Damn it, I got so excited about the Board of Regents doing something right, I spelled both university and Tennessee wrong.Wink
By rla, Mon 3 May 2004 07:55
Looks to me like the RIAA's efforts to educate the public are working. Of course if people get too much smarter about things the RIAA could be standing on the street corner with a hurdy gurdy - hee hee.
By thcz, Mon 3 May 2004 17:25
Oh my, the ballz of some people puke
By Ixne, Mon 3 May 2004 17:36
States should go after the RIAA under the federal Organized Crime and Racketeering statutes that have been put in place. This is obviously protection money. puke

Name: Email:



Your comment:

Receive notification on new comments?