Think the RIAA cares about its image? Read this!
Posted on 15/08/06 14:28 by Quema34                             
Think the RIAA cares about its image?  Read this!

This is a shorter article dealing with how senseless and how much of a one-track (pardon the pun) mind the RIAA has, not even caring that the dear defendant departed!  Now they are still pursuing the case with the man's children:

It's been quite clear for some time that no one at the RIAA ever bothers to think about the PR impact of their moves, but isn't there someone there who thought that perhaps this was a case that they could let go of?

With the case allegedly only to be worth a few thousand dollars,  the average citizen could not afford to file a lawsuit for--but the much-beloved RIAA demonstrates by its actions that "frivolousness" isn't a word it recognizes and at least with this specific example, raises such ridiculousness to a macabre art form!  If I remember correctly, in China if someone even brings a legitmate case to court, the plaintiff MUST win, or the plaintiff has to pay ALL legal costs on both sides AND the court costs.  I have certainly never heard of any case in the U.S. continuing after the death of the defendant, and there must be laws to prevent his children from being sued.  That aside, common sense dictates a few thousand dollars isn't sufficient for a case, as (for example), lawyers quote that to "prepare a defense for sexual harassment" costs $25,000.  Sounds as if someone managed to hit the RIAA with a 2 x 4 that the impact would break the board, and the RIAA would be none the wiser to what happened.

Source: Techdirt

Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By strachan, Tuesday 15 August 2006 14:58
Is there a longer article somewhere that tells more of this story?
By strachan, Tuesday 15 August 2006 15:00
sorry, just noticed the word "case" is a link.
By ivid, Tuesday 15 August 2006 15:26
Don't be sorry, it took me a few minutes to find that tiny practically invisible link!
By Crabbyappleton, Tuesday 15 August 2006 16:16
CrabbyappletonSorry guys, we just made it (the link) bigger. Thanks for the feedback, it is appreciated! Smilie
[edited by Crabbyappleton on 15.08.2006 16:16]
By tumbar, Tuesday 15 August 2006 16:57
The RIAA has attorneys on staff. Its what attorney's do for a living. Intimidation and extortion is their stock and trade. Wink
By Dismembered Ninja, Tuesday 15 August 2006 17:15
Dismembered NinjaStrangely RIAA have decided to drop the case after they felt an "abundance of sensitivity" http://techdirt.com/articles/20060815/015216.shtml Nothing to do with bad press at all
By andyman210, Tuesday 15 August 2006 18:40
so the guy admitted that it was his stepson that downloaded the music, how long did it take the RIAA to realize that a deathbed confession isn't worth diddley if the star witness is dead. I suppose that if the RIAA can charge royalties for dead artists they might consider "coffin" up some money for the artists that they screwed in the pre-internet days. Guess I should correct that...the pre-internet, present internet and post internet days. The RIAA business model is totally outdated and expired
By Tremo, Tuesday 15 August 2006 21:01
Hold on a minute. Is the RIAA going after people who upload and share their files with others, or are they now going after those who only download? If someone were to log onto a filesharing network, with no files in their "shared" folder, and they only downloaded one song, how could RIAA find out?
By bichonn, Tuesday 15 August 2006 21:22
bichonnI have posted the entire letter here: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=189723
By heystoopid, Wednesday 16 August 2006 00:00
Apparently, after adverse PR generated by such Web Sites as Boing Boing, Major Geeks and many other bloggs and internet news sites, the latest news to hand is that these proceedings have been terminated! The RIAA spokesperson stated as the matter is now closed ,they wish to make no further comment about this case! Hmm, the power of the net? cool
By Wesociety, Wednesday 16 August 2006 19:19
WesocietyThe link is always at the top, directly underneath the title of the article. In this case, "Source: Techdirt".
By debro, Monday 21 August 2006 11:41
debroThe RIAA is lining it's own coffin. I'm nominating the RIAA for a Darwin Award!
Name: Email:



Your comment:

Receive notification on new comments?