UK ISPs upset over BBC IPTV service bandwidth
Posted on 15/08/07 00:24 by Seán Byrne                             
UK ISPs upset over BBC IPTV service bandwidth

Up until now, surveys carried out of Internet traffic have found that a bulk of the traffic is from file sharing networks such as BitTorrent.  Some ISPs are also infamously known for throttling such traffic or in some extreme cases even blocking it.  Now ISPs in the UK are getting aggravated over a new bandwidth hog - the BBC iPlayer.  This service will allow British users to download BBC content for free within the UK, however, the beta version released just last month has already been reported to upset ISPs over the bandwidth requirements.  For example, Tiscali UK complained that it would congest its network to the point where it would require network upgrades, while other ISPs say they may have to increase the price based on usage or apply traffic shaping for video traffic to give priority to other traffic.

The content offered by BBC's iPlayer is free and funded by TV license fees, but is infected with Windows Media DRM where the content expires after 30 days of downloading and only plays on PCs running the Microsoft Windows OS.  Content is distributed using a peer to peer network approach.  As the BBC aims to make its archive of about 100 years' worth of content available through its iPlayer service, this will potentially attract a lot of consumer interest very quickly. 

The service is not available outside of the UK or to Linux or Macintosh users, although the BBC announced it is working to make the service available to other platforms.  At this time, there are about 7.2 million IPTV subscribers in Western Europe, although it is unclear what portion of these are UK IPTV subscribers.  This figure is expected to increase to 21.3 million by 2010.

Further info can be read in this source E-Commerce Times article.

Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By Suxen (guest), Wednesday 15 August 2007 02:12
That's the price you pay for progress. Everyone needs to move forward. The lines/networks will need upgraded eventually in any case. But I sure don't have sympathy for the ISPs. Many of them have horrible bandwidth limitations in terms of GB/mth. Those who do get unlimited can be subjected to a fair use policy whenever a company has enough of it. And then there's the way they group as many people onto a server as possible, rather than keeping a sensible limit for all round reasonable speeds. At least we got past the days of dialup and the constant busy signal.
By shaolin007, Wednesday 15 August 2007 06:41
shaolin007I hope that Verizon Fiber Optic comes to a city near me. i would like to have 15Mb/sec down and 3Mb/sec UP. Better than cable and at the same price. I think they offer higher speeds but at a premium price.
By aktiv8 (guest), Wednesday 15 August 2007 15:43
Well the ISPs should get off their backsides and supply a better service. Haveing seen the progressionin fiber optic delivery etc for high speed internet in France or example, the UK shoudl pull their finger out. But it's just a case of third rate quality for a country which is going forth rate in terms of technology supply
By Lee (guest), Wednesday 15 August 2007 17:09
the BBC has a huge archive of tv and radio and once again the uk people will miss out becuase the tech isnt up to date. pathetic
By Tim (guest), Wednesday 15 August 2007 18:32
Boo-bloody-hoo for those ISPs. What kind of business model gets away with that kind of attitude? The ISP model means a committment to perpetual upgrades! If they are "shaping traffic" or limiting bandwidth for certain types of traffic, then it's an indication that the ISP is at fault. Adapt, evolve, progress or die. The choices are simple. There is no sympathy for the ISPs because they deserve none. This is like the Post Office saying "hey, let's stop the internet because we can handle everything the internet currently does, only a wee bit more slowly"...
By Rick (guest), Wednesday 15 August 2007 21:39
Tiscali are the Uk's worst ISP. They cry if you use your connection for anything other than browsing the web, Then throttle your speed to less than dial up puke
By Paul (guest), Saturday 18 August 2007 00:26
If the BBC are going to do this then the chances are that the other UK broadcasters (ITV, CH4, CH5 & Sky) are going to do the same at some time, what will the Service Providers do then ? Paul
By Gorskar, Sunday 19 August 2007 01:09
GorskarThe UK ISP market is very competitive, and products are priced at a level where its assumed that they will be only lightly used, and with a very slim profit margin. I think you can only say "I have no sympathy for the ISPs" if you are willing to pay a reasonable monthly fee to cover your usage. £20/month doesn't pay for very much given that most ISPs resell BT Wholesale service to provide the link from their data centres to consumers homes (£1.5M/year excl VAT for a 622Mb central pipe) It works out that an hour of peak time iPlayer use costs an ISP about 67 pence. No business can afford to give something away at less than it costs them. If you want something then pay for it!
Name: Email:



Your comment:

Receive notification on new comments?