Why the SSSCA is bad, and how to buy a law
Posted on 08/03/02 23:30 by Jan Willem                             
Why the SSSCA is bad, and how to buy a law

lanky used our newssubmit to tell us about an intetresting article from FOXNews explaining why SSSCA is bad, why it is happening (the obvious), and also the likely outcome of it. It brings up some interesting points of the current "we are worried about our stockholders interest" blerb..


Talk about screwing the little guy: audits of record companies routinely indicate "errors" that are always in the companies' favor. (Recording artist Peggy Lee just won a big judgment, and many other artists' lawsuits are pending). Accounting is byzantine enough to make Enron's look simple.

Record companies regularly deduct 15 percent off the top of sales as an allowance for "breakage" '” a survival from the days of shellac records that now simply serves to reduce artist royalties by that amount. Despite being illegal, payola is rife, keeping interesting artists off the air in favor of the manufactured hitmaker of the week. And now, record companies '” who have allied themselves with the just-as-bad motion picture industry '“ want to make it a felony for you to own a computer that is capable of copying music from a CD to your portable player without paying them money, even though courts have held that such copying is entirely legal.


Intresting article that shows what money can do to people. But hey, I'm not even sure what I would do when I would get that money.

I think offering this kind of money should not be obliged, or uhm, is this actually not obliged and is the record industry naught again . It seems they fall deeper and deeper...

Source: Foxnews.com

Reactions
Discuss this article with your fellow community members! We appreciate your valuable input, but please keep the reaction policy in mind and make sure your reaction is constructive.
By Guest, Saturday 09 March 2002 00:04
i don't know what kind of messed up person would support SSSCA. it's very wrong and removing ppls rights. i hate it.
By Guest, Saturday 09 March 2002 03:56
Go to http://www.eff.org and join or atleast particiapte. They have alerts bout this stuff and ways you can let your voice be heard.
By Guest, Saturday 09 March 2002 09:59
this type of thing has already happened before, how quickly people forget. when the cell phone industry was getting started, they were upset that people could listen in to cell phone conversations on police scanners. the cell phone industry then went to congress, threw a bunch of money around, and got a bunch of new laws passed. this was far cheaper than to make the cell phones secure. one of the laws that was passed, forbid the manufacture of scanners that could pick up the cell phone frequencies. congress about 10 years ago forced scanner manufactures to make modifications to their products to please the cell phone companies. i'm sure this will happen again with SSSCA as long as the right people get money.
By Wiccabilly, Saturday 09 March 2002 13:54
Axia: The type of person who would suuport SSSCA is a politician. Members of that honorable profession make their living lying to voters, aking vast coporate bribes, and promptly betraying the public trust. Is that not consistent with SSSCA's aims?
Name: Email:



Your comment:

Receive notification on new comments?