CDFreaks Poll
An upscaling DVD player is worth the money?
Yes, my DVD movies look better
No, DVD quality is good enough
I don't buy content on discs anymore, downloads baby!
No, Blu-ray is the future
Based on 499 ratings

detail information

Posted by Dennis
Posted on 13/10/03 12:39
Number of views 5764
Menu
Write Tests
 

During the introduction we already mentioned that the AOpen DRW4410 is not the newest drive around. But, the drive has some decent recording speeds on board, including 24x CD-R and 4x DVD+R recording. On this page of our review we'll see what these recording speeds mean when writing data compilations.

Writing Data CD-R:


For our CD-R data writing tests we simply set up a new compilation of 700MB using the Nero Burning Rom 5.5 software. We used the DAO (Disc At Once) writing method. The disc was finalized and set-up as a non-multisession disc. In the screenshot below you can see the burn process completed successfully:

As you can see from the screenshot, the burn process was completed in 4 minutes and 14 seconds. This recording time is a little slower than we saw on the Sanyo CRD-BPDV2 DVD recorder (4m:03s), but it's still fast enough for people who only record an occasional CD or two.

CD-R Write Quality:


In the graphs below, produced with the PlexTools Professional software and a Plextor Premium drive, you can see an overview of errors occurring during the read process. Please note that every burned disc will always have C1 errors. These are errors that are corrected by the drive and they will not affect the disc in a bad way as long as their amount is limited. C2 errors are however very bad for a disc and are harder to read and correct. When there are CU errors present on the disc it means you have bad burned disc and it can't be read in the test drive you're using as a reader.

Also keep in mind that the number of C1/C2/CU errors depends on a number of different factors. The combination of software, hardware and read speed have an effect on the results. Since we're using different software in this review and a different drive for reading the disc, the results may be (a little) different than when using other software like, for instance, Lite-On's WSES software. Nevertheless all programs will give you a good idea of the quality of the written disc.


AOpen - 52x certified - 24x write

Manufacturer: Ritek
Code: 97m15s17f
Disc Type: CD-R
Recording Layer: Dye Type 7: Short Strategy (Phthalocyanine)
Capacity: 79:59.70 (702MB)
Certified Speed: 52x
Write Speed: 24x
Write Time: 4m:12s
C1 Average/Sec: 0.4
C2 Average/Sec: 0.0
CU Average/Sec: 0.0

The AOpen (Ritek) disc that came with the DRW4410 drive was recorder with excellent quality. There were hardly any C1 errors (0.4 average) and there were no C2/CU errors on the disc.


Maxell - 48x certified - 24x write

Manufacturer: MPO
Code: 97m25s07f
Disc Type: CD-R
Recording Layer: Dye Type 7: Short Strategy (Phthalocyanine)
Capacity: 79:59.00 (703 MB)
Certified Speed: 48x
Write Speed: 24x
Write Time: 4m:17s
C1 Average/Sec: 5.3
C2 Average/Sec: 0.0
CU Average/Sec: 0.0

The Maxell (MPO) discs had a lot more C1 errors than we saw on the AOpen disc but their amount is not too high. There were no C2/CU errors on the disc and thus overall the disc was recorded well.


Imation - 48x certified - 24x write

Manufacturer: CMC Magnetics
Code: 97m26s66f
Disc Type: CD-R
Recording Layer: Dye Type 6: Short Strategy (Phthalocyanine)
Capacity: 79:59.71 (703 MB)
Certified Speed: 48x
Write Speed: 24x
Write Time: 4m:12s
C1 Average/Sec: 3.9
C2 Average/Sec: 0.0
CU Average/Sec: 0.0

The Imation media, manufactured by CMC Magnetics, had a lower amount of C1 errors than we saw on the previous Maxell discs. So, since there were again no C2/CU errors on the disc, this is another well recorded disc.


MAM-E - 48x certified - 24x write

Manufacturer: Mitsui
Code: 97m27s58f
Disc Type: CD-R
Recording Layer: Dye Type 8: Short Strategy (Phthalocyanine)
Capacity: 79:59.74 (703MB)
Certified Speed: 48x
Write Speed: 24x
Write Time: 4m:14s
C1 Average/Sec: 8.3
C2 Average/Sec: 0.0
CU Average/Sec: 0.0

With an average C1 error count of 8.3 the MAM-E media had the highest amount of C1 errors. As you can see from the graph the amount of C1 errors decreases throughout the disc. Once again, there were no C2/CU errors on the disc so overall the AOpen DRW4410 showed good performance when it comes to CD-R recording quality.

Writing Data DVD+R:


To test the AOpen's performance when writing DVD media we set up a new UDF/ISO compilation of roughly 4400MB in Nero Burning ROM and started the recording process:

The AOpen DRW4410 drive completed the recording process in 15 minutes and 22 seconds. This is not the fastest time we've seen since we when we write the same compilation with a Plextor PX-708A DVD recorder it only needed 14m:32s (when recording at 4x of course). The Sanyo CRD-BPDV2 recorder needed 14m:59s to record the same data compilation so overall the AOpen drive was the slowest 4x DVD+R recorder I've reviewed.

DVD+R Write Quality:


Unfortunately the only method of testing the write quality of a DVDR disc is by using the Kprobe software. The problem however is that Kprobe requires a Lite-On DVD-ROM drive to measure the errors on the DVD disc and I unfortunately don't own a Lite-On DVD-ROM drive. So, in order to somewhat test the write quality of the recorded DVD disc I simply watched them on a few standalone DVD players. I also played the DVDs in my very picky Xbox console and all discs played perfectly.

Now that we've finished our normal read and write tests, it's time to check the drive's re-write performance...
Want to submit your own review? Click here
Reactions on this item
Did you use a pressed or CD-R disc for your DAE tests? The reason I'm asking is because I've seen a number of slow down problems with pressed discs. Part way through the session, the speed drops off for no reason. This is the same problem Ricoh's first and second gen drives had.
Hi Ian,

I used a pressed CD for the DAE test (the advanced tests with Nero CD-DVD Speed were of course done with a CD-R disc). I always use the same discs for my reviews so because there were no problems I of course didn't do extra testing. I can check if there are read problems with other audio discs?
If you want. It didn't happen all the time either. Very sporadic. Some discs were worse than others too.
What do you think? Leave your comments!

Your message
:) :( ;) :r :d :B :X :c :o :g :+ :p :* :S

Your name
Your e-mail


Type in the code

Don't like to type in this code? Please register or login.
Related tags
A tag is a relevant keyword or term associated with or assigned to a piece of information (like picture, product, or video clip), thus describing the item and enabling keyword-based classification of information it is applied to. We use it to make searching our database easier and enable all our users to contribute to our database.

Add related tags
CD Freaks allows items to be tagged with objective specifications, no opinions or subjective descriptions. When your start typing our system will suggest tags, if this is what you mean, please use these first. Our system will also check for spelling mistakes and correct them to keep our database consistent. Finally tags are moderated by our team members.

    Related reviews/articles
    Get the latest reviews via RSS RSS