Forumdetail information
| Posted by | Wendy Collins |
| Posted on | 23/09/06 01:03 |
Verbatim branded - YUDEN000T02:
We created our test data discs using CD-Speed's 'create data disc" function.
Burning drive '� BenQ DW1640:
Burn speed 8x
Transfer Rate Test
Scanning drive '� BenQ DW1640:
Scanning drive '� NEC ND-4570A:
Scanning drive '� Lite-ON SHW-16H5S
Scanning drive '� Plextor PX-760A:
|
Scanning |
PI |
PIF |
|
BenQ |
2.38 |
0.05 |
|
NEC |
3.65 |
0.03 |
|
Lite-On |
0.72 |
0.01 |
|
Plextor |
0.98 |
0.00 |
All our scanning drives show a similar trend, PI levels are however higher with our BenQ and NEC scans.
Burning drive - LG GSA-H10N:
Burn speed 8x
Transfer rate test
Scanning drive '� BenQ DW1640:
Scanning drive '� NEC ND-4570A:
Scanning drive '� Lite-ON SHW-16H5S
Scanning drive '� Plextor PX-760A:
|
Scanning |
PI |
PIF |
|
BenQ |
5.46 |
0.84 |
|
NEC |
3.64 |
0.03 |
|
Lite-On |
0.66 |
0.07 |
|
Plextor |
0.76 |
0.00 |
On this occasion the BenQ and NEC drives show elevated PI errors and a PI spike at roughly the same area of the disc where the writing speed jumped from 6x to 8x. The Lite-On and Plextor drives don't show this.
Burning drive '� Lite-On SHW-16H5S:
Burn speed 8x
Transfer rate test
Scanning drive '� BenQ DW1640:
Scanning drive '� NEC ND-4570A:
Scanning drive '� Lite-ON SHW-16H5S
Scanning drive '� Plextor PX-760A:
|
Scanning |
PI |
PIF |
|
BenQ |
5.93 |
0.05 |
|
NEC |
6.87 |
0.01 |
|
Lite-On |
1.35 |
0.00 |
|
Plextor |
2.57 |
0.00 |
Although none of our drives had any problems in scanning this test disc, the Plextor and Lite-On drives reported the most similar error levels.
Burning drive '� NEC ND-4570A:
Burn speed 8x
Transfer rate test
Scanning drive '� BenQ DW1640:
Scanning drive '� NEC ND-4570A:
Scanning drive '� Lite-On SHW-16H5S:
Scanning drive '� Plextor PX-760A:
|
Scanning |
PI |
PIF |
|
BenQ |
3.49 |
0.02 |
|
NEC |
4.02 |
0.01 |
|
Lite-On |
0.69 |
0.01 |
|
Plextor |
1.01 |
0.00 |
All our scanning drives show a fairly similar trend on this test disc, although the BenQ and NEC drives show higher average PI levels.
Burning drive '� Pioneer DVR-111:
Burn speed 8x
Transfer rate test
Scanning drive '� BenQ DW1640:
Scanning drive '� NEC ND-4570A:
Scanning drive '� Lite-On SHW-16H5S:
Scanning drive '� Plextor PX-760A:
|
Scanning |
PI |
PIF |
|
BenQ |
1.97 |
0.02 |
|
NEC |
2.79 |
0.01 |
|
Lite-On |
0.73 |
0.01 |
|
Plextor |
0.94 |
0.00 |
Once again our scanning drives broadly agreed with each other with this test disc.
Burning drive '� Plextor PX-760A:
Burn speed 8x
Transfer rate test
Scanning drive '� BenQ DW1640:
Scanning drive '� NEC ND-4570A:
Scanning drive '� Lite-On SHW-16H5S:
Scanning drive '� Plextor PX-760A:
|
Scanning |
PI |
PIF |
|
BenQ |
1.75 |
0.01 |
|
NEC |
3.13 |
0.01 |
|
Lite-On |
0.66 |
0.00 |
|
Plextor |
0.97 |
0.00 |
Again all our scanning drives showed a similar trend on this test disc, although the NEC drive in particular showed a higher average level of PI errors .
Summary:
With our Taiyo Yuden YUDEN000T02 8x DVD+R media, all our scanning drives showed a very similar trend with our test media. The exception being, the BenQ DW1640 and NEC ND-4570A which showed elevated PI errors on a couple of our test discs.
Now let's head onto the next page where we will test Verbatim MCC004 16x media…..
Burning and Scanning hardware
Cdfreaks rulez
I will post it, in some fé³rums at my country..
Mordorr
Thanks Cdfreaks
This message was edited at: 26-04-2007 12:39
This chart seems to show that they're suppose to be first class quality. http://www.digitalfaq.com/media/dvdmedia.htm
So do these scans results show that they're first class DVD-R's, or do they belong more in the second class group?
add a tag
