detail information
| Posted by | Wendy Collins |
| Posted on | 23/09/06 01:03 |
Verbatim branded - MCC03RG20:
We created our test data discs using CD-Speed's 'create data disc" function.
Burning drive '� BenQ DW1640:

Burn speed 16x

Transfer rate test
Scanning drive '� BenQ DW1640:

Scanning drive '� NEC ND-4570A:

Scanning drive '� Lite-On SHW-16H5S:

Scanning drive '� Plextor PX-760A:



|
Scanning |
PI |
PIF |
|
BenQ |
4.89 |
0.04 |
|
NEC |
26.82 |
0.04 |
|
Lite-On |
7.76 |
0.02 |
|
Plextor |
4.07 |
0.01 |
All our scanning drives show broadly similar PIF errors, the NEC drive however shows elevated PI errors on this test disc compared to our other drives.
Burning drive '� LG GSA-H10N:

Burn speed 16x

Transfer rate test
Scanning drive '� BenQ DW1640:

Scanning drive '� NEC ND-4570A:

Scanning drive '� Lite-On SHW-16H5S:

Scanning drive '� Plextor PX-760A:



|
Scanning |
PI |
PIF |
|
BenQ |
23.91 |
0.05 |
|
NEC |
64.12 |
0.07 |
|
Lite-On |
2.84 |
0.02 |
|
Plextor |
1.24 |
0.00 |
The BenQ and NEC drives show higher average PI error levels compared to the Lite-On and Plextor drives. Again our two CLV scanning drives (Lite-On and Plextor) prove to give the most similar results.
Burning drive '� Lite-On SHW-16H5S:

Burn speed 16x

Transfer rate test
Scanning drive '� BenQ DW1640:

Scanning drive '� NEC ND-4570A:

Scanning drive '� Lite-On SHW-16H5S:

Scanning drive '� Plextor PX-760A:



|
Scanning |
PI |
PIF |
|
BenQ |
40.69 |
0.07 |
|
NEC |
72.46 |
0.26 |
|
Lite-On |
15.27 |
0.02 |
|
Plextor |
18.73 |
0.01 |
The NEC scan is very much out of step with the other drives, and once again the BenQ drive has problems at the recalibration point and shows higher average levels of PI errors. The Lite-On and Plextor drives once again appear to show us the more comparable results.
Burning drive '� NEC ND-4570A:

Burn speed 16x

Transfer rate test
Scanning drive '� BenQ DW1640:

Scanning drive '� NEC ND-4570A:

Scanning drive '� Lite-On SHW-16H5S:

Scanning drive '� Plextor PX-760A:



|
Scanning |
PI |
PIF |
|
BenQ |
7.15 |
0.08 |
|
NEC |
26.56 |
0.11 |
|
Lite-On |
3.75 |
0.01 |
|
Plextor |
1.27 |
0.00 |
Our NEC scanning drive shows elevated PI errors on this test disc. The BenQ scanning drive shows POF errors on the disc. We have to question this as the Plextor drive is also capable of reporting POF and does not report any. The Transfer Rate Test of the disc is also perfect. Once again it appears that the Lite-On and Plextor drives show the most consistency with their results.
Because the BenQ drive had reported POF errors on this test disc. We decided to also run a Transfer Rate Test on the BenQ drive. As we can see from the screenshot below, we can see no reason why the BenQ drive reported POF errors on this disc.

Burning drive '� Pioneer DVR-111:

Burn speed 8x

Transfer rate test
Scanning drive '� BenQ DW1640:

Scanning drive '� NEC ND-4570A:

Scanning drive '� Lite-On SHW-16H5S:

Scanning drive '� Plextor PX-760A:



|
Scanning |
PI |
PIF |
|
BenQ |
4.69 |
0.14 |
|
NEC |
38.08 |
0.08 |
|
Lite-On |
0.86 |
0.02 |
|
Plextor |
1.32 |
0.00 |
This time our NEC reports elevated errors on our test disc compared to our other drives.
Burning drive '� Plextor PX-760A:

Burn speed 16x

Transfer rate test
Scanning drive '� BenQ DW1640:

Scanning drive '� NEC ND-4570A:

Scanning drive '� Lite-On SHW-16H5S:

Scanning drive '� Plextor PX-760A:



|
Scanning |
PI |
PIF |
|
BenQ |
4.94 |
0.04 |
|
NEC |
18.49 |
0.05 |
|
Lite-On |
5.33 |
0.03 |
|
Plextor |
3.74 |
0.00 |
Once again our NEC scanning drive is out of step with our other scanning drives. Our other drives show broadly similar results.
Summary:
With our Verbatim branded MCC03RG20 test discs, our results once again show the Lite-On and Plextor drives to report broadly similar results. The NEC and BenQ drives have problems with some discs burned on a few of our burning drives.
On the next page we will run basic scanning consistency tests on our scanning drives.....

Cdfreaks rulez
I will post it, in some fé³rums at my country..
Mordorr


Thanks Cdfreaks

This message was edited at: 26-04-2007 12:39




This chart seems to show that they're suppose to be first class quality. http://www.digitalfaq.com/media/dvdmedia.htm
So do these scans results show that they're first class DVD-R's, or do they belong more in the second class group?

CMC MAG AE1 
add a tag