Lite-On 40/12/48X CD-RW
detail information
| Posted by | Robin |
| Posted on | 23/06/02 16:00 |
| Number of views | 10814 |
Menu
Reading scratched discs
For this test we used an original game demo CD that was shipped with a computer game magazine. We used very fine sanding paper to get a lot of scratches on the disc. And then used the ScanDisc function in Nero CD-Speed. Below is some screenshots from various drives:
Lite-On LXR-24101A.
Mitsumi CR-4809TE. Note that this drive do not support reporting damaged sectors, only readable or unreadable.
Asus E616 DVD-ROM.
Lite-On LTD-163D DVD-ROM.
Lite-On LTR-24102B.
Lite-On LTR-32123S.
Lite-On LTR-40125S firmware ZS0A .
Lite-On LTR-40125S firmware ZS0J .
Summary
This time we saw a small difference between firmware ZS0A and firmware ZS0J. With firmware ZS0J it was able to read a bit more of the disc and reported less damaged sectors. Compared to the other readers there was not a big difference.
Reading a bad CD-R disc.
For this test we used a CD-R disc created with a LTR-24102B CD-Writer. The disc we uses was some noname crap with unknown speed certification, the disc was written at the speed that the smartburn technology picked (which was 24X). Here is the manufacturer information of the disc:
- ATIP: 97m 26s 00f
- Disc Manufacturer: Fornet International Pte Ltd.
- Reflective layer: Dye (Long strategy; e.g. Cyanine, Azo etc.)
- Media type: CD-Recordable
- Recording Speeds: min. unknown - max. unknown
- Nominal Capacity: 658.30MB (74m 56s 00f / LBA: 337050)
Lite-On LXR-24101A.
Mitsumi CR-4809TE. Note that this drive do not support reporting damaged sectors, only readable or unreadable.
Lite-On LTR-24102B.
Lite-On LTD-163D DVD-ROM.
Lite-On LTR-32123S.
Asus E616 DVD-ROM.
Lite-On LTR-40125S firmware ZS0A .
Lite-On LTR-40125S firmware ZS0J.
Summary
Again firmware ZS0J gave a marginally better result than ZS0A. Compared to the other drives there is not a big difference this time either and we could conclude with that the drive is pretty good at reading scratched data discs and bad CD-R discs, especially if you use firmware ZS0J. The LTR-48125W performed the same as LTR-40125S with ZS0J firmware.
But this is a CD-Writer and should be used for writing! Let us start with writing tests at the next page…
Want to submit your own review? Click here

Posted by MP|3 on Thursday 27 June 2002 03:10
Complete review uploaded! Have fun with this great review 



Posted by OC-Freak on Thursday 27 June 2002 21:52
PLEASE comment this review. Over 5000 views and no comments?
Both positive and negative comments wanted. Quetions welcomed as well.
Both positive and negative comments wanted. Quetions welcomed as well.


Great review, already own the drive, wanted to see where you had it rated. Speed is great, even though I think its not as loud as listed, but other than that and its boring looks, this drive rocks! Good tests, indepth and professional, keep up the good work!
Mike
Mike


Posted by ExSport on Saturday 29 June 2002 01:59
Very good review. But I don't understand why Lite-on has only 9.5 and Teac 10. In 90% of tests Liteon was the best and TEAC was second. LITEON has best price,speed,game backup,and so on).I think it's minimally the same as TEAC, maybe better. I have LITE-ON, I know what I say.


If you want more comments how about fixing the pull down menu code so it works in netscape6/mozilla/opera so people can create a login, or better still allow anonymous posting.
Great review, very thorough.
I must stress that the drive is ugly looking and the loader try is very loud and cheap feeling. I prefer the LG 40X over the Lite-On 40x because of this although technically they both perform well.
Great review, very thorough.
I must stress that the drive is ugly looking and the loader try is very loud and cheap feeling. I prefer the LG 40X over the Lite-On 40x because of this although technically they both perform well.


Posted by Fish3669 on Saturday 29 June 2002 22:09
I thought the review covered the drive very well, as do the other reviews here. I already have this drive and I like it :7


Posted by cj2304 on Sunday 07 July 2002 12:09
Good, indepth & informative review. Well done! I have this drive myself and can't fault it.


Fantastic review. I will have to read your reviews about other drives as well. I like the speed and performance of this drive, but there was one aspect which seemed unclear. These discs that are written with SmartBurn, shouldn't they be completely free of all bad sectors or damaged sectors? I can understand that some CD-R's are crap, but I would think that the Smart-Burn would be able to lower the speed to the point where one could expect 100% perfect burns. I have an old Plextor 8X, and am looking to upgrade, these fast burners are great, but what I still want is 100% perfect recording, even if the drive drops to 24X writing, I would expect that if the media is good enough (certified 24X), it would always write perfectly.
I want to check the rest of your reviews to see which drive writes perfectly every single time, whenever it's "active-media detection" technology is engaged.
I want to check the rest of your reviews to see which drive writes perfectly every single time, whenever it's "active-media detection" technology is engaged.


Great review. I went right out and bought one. What is the difference between thew S and W models? Do you lose anything?


Australian PC User has reviewed the 40125W the "best buy". They found it both cheap and reliable. I checked with the elby CloneCD 4 web site (http://elby.ch/english/products/clone_cd/writers/l.html#liteon) and it says it supports DAO96.
So there you go. Looks like this will be the first CD-burner for this newbie. :4
So there you go. Looks like this will be the first CD-burner for this newbie. :4


Great review. I was trying to decide whether to get the Asus 4816A or the Lite-On 40125S after my Acer 4x4x32 finally died :4. Thanks for making my mind up
I'm going to buy the Lite-On this week.
I'm going to buy the Lite-On this week.

Posted by MythosGR on Tuesday 03 September 2002 13:55
Great review as always. But I had the teac in my mind till now and Im more confused cause of the score you gave both!


first thang first...CD Freaks!? mega indepth and wicked review you've got here! LTR-40125S IS THE KING!!! it's a supurb burning machine! i bought the drive five days before reading the review, mainly cuz a friend told me that it can be overclocked. on the first day i got it, i burned more than 20 perfect cds consecutively. i very much enjoy it's lightning speed. i believe that your review should give it 9.9 (cuz nothing is perfect in the world) for the time being as there will be more great drives in the near future, and teac should only get 9 outta 10. i'm not being bias or anything..as i have never used teac before, but the review clearly speaks for itself, that the performance of liteon surpassed teac. the best part is flashable firmware enabling anyone to overclock it and still running rock solid. sometimes, overclocking isn't all that bad cuz it can show what a hardward is capable of. for me the strongest factor which makes liteon superior to other brands is "value of money". it's not the cheapest rw in town, but it surely has one of the lowest caparable price on today's market. especially when overclocked it will make 40125S the cheapest 48X drive available..so worthy you can even buy a spare in case you wreck the first one. the noise the tray makes and the plainess and dullness of the front to me are bearable. i simply just luv everything about my 40125S. LITEON RULES MAN!!!


gr8 review. made me buy the Liteon.
Please explain on the possiblity to use a x48 firmware on this machine.
although not legal/voids warranty / with risks, is it simple to do? possible?
Any elaboration is welcomed. Thanks.
Please explain on the possiblity to use a x48 firmware on this machine.
although not legal/voids warranty / with risks, is it simple to do? possible?
Any elaboration is welcomed. Thanks.


Posted by theunbeatable on Friday 06 December 2002 23:31
For better support on copy-protected cd's you could use the newest firmware ZS0P. So makes that a 10 out of 10 



Posted by megod on Tuesday 10 December 2002 06:32
Just did a Quick test burning a Simulated 699mb file 588 solid Win RAR File & a 111mb Video file on a 16x Certified Go Tech "Cheap shit media",
LTR-48125w Safeburn off 48x "2.43min"
LTR-48125w Safeburn on 40x "3.09min"
Yamaha CRW3200e Write speed Off 24x "3.52min"
Yamaha CRW3200e Write speed On 24x "3.53min"
I must say I am Impressed with the LiteOn.
Cheers
megod:9
LTR-48125w Safeburn off 48x "2.43min"
LTR-48125w Safeburn on 40x "3.09min"
Yamaha CRW3200e Write speed Off 24x "3.52min"
Yamaha CRW3200e Write speed On 24x "3.53min"
I must say I am Impressed with the LiteOn.
Cheers
megod:9


I've got this LTR-48125S. Whenever overburning is involved, any speed higher than 16x will be successful, but Scandisc shows Unreadable sectors! How could the reviewer managed to get a fully readable burn on a 99min CDR with 48X?!?! This drive must be something!
Besides, my drive shows success on overburning test using this CD Speed, even @ 99min using an 80min CD-R
Brand: Arita
Manuf: RiTEK
Besides, my drive shows success on overburning test using this CD Speed, even @ 99min using an 80min CD-R
Brand: Arita
Manuf: RiTEK

Related tags
Add related tags
Related reviews/articles
Music reading tests
add a tag