detail information
| Posted by | Torsten |
| Posted on | 10/11/06 21:00 |
The specifications of this drive tell us that it should write DVD±R at 8x and DVD+RW/-RW at 8x/6x. In this part, we will measure the write time for various types of DVD+R/RW and DVD-R/RW discs. We will also focus on write quality and media compatibility.
Write quality:
You should first notice that this is not a scientific and professional way to test the discs. But according to our testing done in recent months, we would conclude that there is a clear link between the quality reported when scanning the disc and the playability of the disc in different devices. Also notice that different drives report different amounts of errors. K-Probe was designed to work with Lite-On DVD-Writers, so we recommend using a DVD-Writer from Lite-On. In this test we use a Lite-On SHW-1635S DVD-Writer, as already said; remember that scans done with a Lite-On DVD-ROM or Lite-On combo drive can’t be compared with the results obtained with a Lite-On DVD-Writer. Also remember that different PI/PO ECC sum settings along with different reading speeds in K-Probe will affect the result, we use these settings; PI (Parity Inner) set to summarize 8 ECC blocks, PIF (Parity Inner Failures) set to summarize 1 ECC block, reading speed: 4X CLV (Constant Linear Velocity). Setting the PI sum to 8 and the PIF sum to 1 will give a result that we may compare to the standards for DVD+R/RW and DVD-R/RW.
But what is a good scan? That is a discussion that we don’t think will end soon, as different drives report different amount of errors, some players are more picky about media than others, and so on. But as a comparison we present you with a scan from two pressed DVD discs:

This scan shows the results from a pressed DVD-Video disc (GoldenEye).

This scan shows the result from a pressed DVD-Video disk (The Green Mile). Notice the error jump when shifting to the second layer (the error level actually drops from the end of the first layer to the beginning of the second layer).
If you read below, you will see that both the pressed DVD-discs are well within the standards.
Download the ECMA 267 Standard for DVD-ROM, the ECMA 337 Standard for DVD+R/RW and the ECMA 338 Standard for DVD-R/RW at http://www.ecma-international.org if you want to look at the standards for yourself. Here is some data from the ECMA standards (same for DVD-ROM, DVD-R/RW and DVD+R/RW):
Random errors:
A row of an ECC Block that has at least 1 byte in error constitutes a PI error. In any 8
consecutive ECC Blocks the total number of PI errors before correction shall not exceed 280.
Here we see that a PI error is defined as a row in an ECC block having 1 byte or more containing errors and that the sum of PI errors in 8 ECC blocks after each other should not exceed 280 PI errors.
But what is a row and what is an ECC block? Again we refer to the ECMA standards. We do not copy and paste everything, but if you’re interested, look in the ECMA standards. A row is 182 bytes long where the last 10 bytes contain PI (Parity Inner) information. An ECC block is 208 rows long where the last 16 rows contain the PO (Parity Outer) information. This gives us a maximum possible PI error amount of 208 errors per block and for 8 blocks after each other this sum is of course 8 times higher, giving a maximum possible amount of 1664 PI-8 errors. In practical use, a disc with 1664 PI-8 errors is unreadable.
According to our tests the specified max PI-8 sum of 280 for good discs seems to be a good guideline, as some readers have problems reading discs when the PI-8 errors is over 300 and most players starts to have problems when the PI-8 error level reaches 600 or more.
But what are the PIF errors that K-Probe reports? They are Parity Inner Failures, meaning errors left after PI correction. Only the ECMA 337 standard describes the Parity Inner Failures. So how is a Parity Inner Failure defined? Here is what the ECMA 337 states:
“If a row of an ECC Block as defined in 13.3 contains more than 5 erroneous bytes, the row is said to be “PI-uncorrectable”.”
In theory, an ECC block may in the worst case have 208 PIF since every ECC block is 208 rows long. But the ECMA 337 standard goes further and specifies the max amount of accepted PI Failures (uncorrectable errors) allowed on a good disc:
“In any ECC Block the number of PI-uncorrectable rows should not exceed 4.”
This means that when the PIF sum is set to 1, the maximum error value should not exceed 4. The theoretical maximum value for PIF is 208 errors.
But what makes a disc unreadable? A POF (Parity Outer Failure) error will make the disc unreadable, but K-Probe does not display the POF’s.
Notice that there are other aspects such as disc reflectivity, jitter, tracking errors and so on that also will affect the readability of a DVD disc – but for this we do not have measuring equipment available.
Also, another note is that we have scanned the discs at 4X CLV speed, by lowering the speed to 2X(DVD-R/RW)/2.4X(DVD+R/RW) or 1X the amount of reported errors may drop on some discs. We scanned at 4X CLV due to lower speeds taking too much time.
To see if there is a connection between the reported amount of errors and readability of the discs we also include the reading curve from a NEC ND-4551A DVD-Writer. The reason why we have changed the reader is that some companies disliked that we used a modified firmware to obtain 16x reading speed. So to please them, we are now using a drive that reads DVD+R/-R media at 16x as default. A small speed reduction near the end is still accepted on good discs, but serious reading problems or reading failures is a bad sign.
Easier explanation on how to read the test results.
Maybe this got too technical, and you are wondering what to look for in KProbe reports?
Use this as a guideline for good discs:
PI (Parity Inner): No larger areas on the disc should exceed 280 PI-8 errors, do not worry too much about high single spikes that exceed 280.
PIF (Parity Inner Failures): No larger areas on the disc should exceed 4 PIF-1 errors, do not worry too much about high single spikes that exceed 4.
And as always; lower is better ![]()
And look at the reading curve; if it looks clean with no dips it should be good, a small slowdown near the end is accepted.
DVD+R media compatibility and write quality:
In these tests we will be using a Lite-On SOHW-1693S drive with firmware KS0B along with KProbe to measure the disc quality. We will also be using the NEC ND-4551A with firmware 1-07 along with CD-Speed for our read-back tests.



|
Brand: |
BenQ |
|
Manufacturer: |
Daxon Inc. |
|
Code: |
DAXON AZ2 |
|
Disc Type: |
DVD+R |
|
Capacity: |
4483MB |
|
Certified Speed: |
8x |
|
Write Speed: |
4x |
|
Write Time: |
16m:12s |
|
PI-8 errors Average/Sec: |
11.97 |
|
PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec: |
0.10 |
Good result on this BenQ disc.



|
Brand: |
Datawrite Titanium |
|
Manufacturer: |
Prodisc Technology Inc. |
|
Code: |
Prodisc R03 |
|
Disc Type: |
DVD+R |
|
Capacity: |
4483MB |
|
Certified Speed: |
8x |
|
Write Speed: |
8x – slowed down to 2.4x after writing about 350 MB |
|
Write Time: |
23m:44s |
|
PI-8 errors Average/Sec: |
66.79 |
|
PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec: |
0.03 |
The drive’s AOPC slowed down the burn process to 2.4x which caused the PI to increase. Although PI and PIF are still within the limits, our reading drive had some issues reading the disc.



|
Brand: |
Memorex |
|
Manufacturer: |
CMC Magnetics Corporation |
|
Code: |
CMC MAG E01 |
|
Disc Type: |
DVD+R |
|
Capacity: |
4483MB |
|
Certified Speed: |
8x |
|
Write Speed: |
6x |
|
Write Time: |
13m:31s |
|
PI-8 errors Average/Sec: |
1.20 |
|
PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec: |
0.03 |
An excellent result on these Memorex discs, produced by CMC magnetics. But this 8x certified disc is only supported at 6x



|
Brand: |
MMORE |
|
Manufacturer: |
Moser Baer India Ltd. |
|
Code: |
MBIPG101 R04 |
|
Disc Type: |
DVD+R |
|
Capacity: |
4483MB |
|
Certified Speed: |
8x |
|
Write Speed: |
6x |
|
Write Time: |
13m:29s |
|
PI-8 errors Average/Sec: |
33.54 |
|
PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec: |
0.04 |
MMore 8x certified discs made by Moser Baer India were only supported at 6x. We can see a PI max of 553 which is not within the limits anymore. But our reading drive had no problems during the transfer rate test.



|
Brand: |
Swisstec |
|
Manufacturer: |
Plasmon Data Limited |
|
Code: |
Plasmon1 C01 |
|
Disc Type: |
DVD+R |
|
Capacity: |
4483MB |
|
Certified Speed: |
8x |
|
Write Speed: |
8x |
|
Write Time: |
13m:39s |
|
PI-8 errors Average/Sec: |
57.65 |
|
PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec: |
35.67 |
Plasmon discs are known for not producing the highest quality media. PI and PIF exceed the limits at the end of the disc and our reading drive had an unrecoverable error



|
Brand: |
Traxdata |
|
Manufacturer: |
RiTEK Corporation |
|
Code: |
Ritek R03 |
|
Disc Type: |
DVD+R |
|
Capacity: |
4483MB |
|
Certified Speed: |
8x |
|
Write Speed: |
6x |
|
Write Time: |
13m:31s |
|
PI-8 errors Average/Sec: |
19.28 |
|
PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec: |
0.03 |
A good result on these Traxdata discs, produced by RiTEK Corporation.



|
Brand: |
Taiyo Yuden unbranded |
|
Manufacturer: |
Taiyo Yuden Company Limited |
|
Code: |
YUDEN000 T02 |
|
Disc Type: |
DVD+R |
|
Capacity: |
4483MB |
|
Certified Speed: |
8x |
|
Write Speed: |
8x |
|
Write Time: |
11m:14s |
|
PI-8 errors Average/Sec: |
1.52 |
|
PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec: |
0.01 |
An excellent result on these Tayio Yuden discs, highly recommended.



|
Brand: |
Verbatim |
|
Manufacturer: |
Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation |
|
Code: |
MCC 003 |
|
Disc Type: |
DVD+R |
|
Capacity: |
4483MB |
|
Certified Speed: |
8x |
|
Write Speed: |
6x – slowed down to 2.4x after writing about 4 GB |
|
Write Time: |
14m:31s |
|
PI-8 errors Average/Sec: |
0.89 |
|
PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec: |
0.06 |
Another great result on these Verbatim discs made by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation. However writing the disc was not supported at its certified speed and the drive had to slow down to 2.4x towards the end of the disc.



|
Brand: |
Verbatim |
|
Manufacturer: |
Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation |
|
Code: |
MCC 004 |
|
Disc Type: |
DVD+R |
|
Capacity: |
4483MB |
|
Certified Speed: |
16x |
|
Write Speed: |
8x |
|
Write Time: |
11m:11s |
|
PI-8 errors Average/Sec: |
0.78 |
|
PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec: |
0.05 |
An excellent result on these Verbatim discs, highly recommended.
DVD+ReWritable media:



|
Brand: |
Platinum |
|
Manufacturer: |
Ricoh Company Limited |
|
Code: |
RICOHJPN W11 |
|
Disc Type: |
DVD+RW |
|
Capacity: |
4483MB |
|
Certified Speed: |
4x |
|
Write Speed: |
4x |
|
Write Time: |
16m:01s |
|
PI-8 errors Average/Sec: |
18.48 |
|
PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec: |
3.91 |
With rising PI and PIF – exceeding the limits – towards the end, we cannot recommend this media. Our reading drive was unable to complete the transfer rate test.



|
Brand: |
Ricoh |
|
Manufacturer: |
RICOH Company Limited |
|
Code: |
RICOHJPN W21 |
|
Disc Type: |
DVD+RW |
|
Capacity: |
4483MB |
|
Certified Speed: |
8x |
|
Write Speed: |
8x |
|
Write Time: |
12m:35s |
|
PI-8 errors Average/Sec: |
64.59 |
|
PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec: |
0.14 |
The result is OK for this Ricoh DVD+RW media.



|
Brand: |
Traxdata |
|
Manufacturer: |
RITEK |
|
Code: |
RITEK 008 |
|
Disc Type: |
DVD+RW |
|
Capacity: |
4483MB |
|
Certified Speed: |
8x |
|
Write Speed: |
3.4x |
|
Write Time: |
17m:58s |
|
PI-8 errors Average/Sec: |
34.57 |
|
PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec: |
0.17 |
A good result on this Traxdata media although the PI could be lower at the beginning. The disc was written with a very uncommon 3.4x writing speed.



|
Brand: |
Verbatim |
|
Manufacturer: |
Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation |
|
Code: |
MKM A02 |
|
Disc Type: |
DVD+RW |
|
Capacity: |
4483MB |
|
Certified Speed: |
4x |
|
Write Speed: |
4x |
|
Write Time: |
16m:18s |
|
PI-8 errors Average/Sec: |
1.38 |
|
PI-1 failures (PIF) Avg/Sec: |
0.24 |
An excellent result on this Verbatim media. Highly recommended disc if you need rewritable media.
To sum it up: So far the NEC ND-7551A writes DVD+R and DVD+RW media with good/OK quality. Let’s find out how the drive will do on DVD-R/RW media.
On the next page you will find the DVD-R/RW writing results...
CD-R/RW Writing performance

its weel worth buying
add a tag