CDFreaks Poll
What would you buy for $200 / EUR 200?
A cheap Blu-ray player
An expensive DVD player
Based on 774 ratings

Pioneer DVR-112 detail information

Posted by Wendy Collins
Posted on 24/03/07 17:58
Manufacturer Pioneer
Product Pioneer DVR-112
Description 18x DVD burner supporting DVD-RAM and 10x DVD DL writing speed
Awards Editor's Choice Award
Menu
Reading performance

  

Reading performance


For these tests we will use Nero CD/DVD-Speed to read various CD and DVD’s, including audio discs and DVD-media. As already mentioned in the introduction, this drive supports:

  • DVD-ROM 16x
  • CD-ROM 40x

Pressed discs:

For this test we used a pressed CD-ROM disc containing the Roxio Media Creator 7.5 install CD that is close to 75 minutes in length. Below you will see the produced result:

The Pioneer DVR-112 reached 41.28x read speed. Let’s compare it with some other drives below.

Pressed
Discs

Average
Read
Speed

Start
 Read 
Speed

End
 Read 
Speed

Seek
Times
 Random

Seek
 Times 
1/3

Seek
 Times 
Full

NEC
ND-4550A

34.75x

19.87x

45.99x

128ms

136ms

216ms

NEC
ND-4551A

34.71x

20.01x

45.97x

135ms

145ms

222ms

Philips
DVDR1660

35.70x

20.13x

47.29x

106ms

124ms

176ms

Samsung
SH-W162L

35.75x

17.35x

47.38x

95ms

95ms

169ms

Samsung
SH-S182D

35.58x

19.75x

47.10x

99ms

95ms

169ms

Samsung
SE-S184M

36.25x

17.36x

48.08x

109ms

115ms

187ms

Pioneer
DRV-112

31.25x

18.12x

41.36x

105ms

122ms

198ms

The Pioneer DVR-112 proved to be below average at reading our test CD-ROM. Access and seek times were fairly good.

CD Recordable discs:

For this test we made a copy of the original Roxio Media Creator 7.5 install CD. The disc we used was a Ricoh 52X certified CD-R disc manufactured by Moser Baer India.

The Pioneer DVR-112 reached 41.36x read speed. Let’s compare it with some other drives below.

CD-R
Discs

Average 
Read
Speed

Start
 Read 
Speed

End
 Read 
Speed

Seek
Times
 Random

Seek
 Times 
1/3

Seek
 Times 
Full

NEC
ND-4550A

35.60x

20.74x

47.01x

134ms

136ms

210ms

NEC
ND-4551A

35.53x

20.67x

46.77x

187ms

146ms

218ms

Philips
DVDR1660

36.54x

20.94x

48.27x

104ms

113ms

169ms

Samsung
SH-W162L

30.82x

16.85x

40.66x

88ms

90ms

157ms

Samsung
SH-S182D

30.65x

17.28x

40.52x

92ms

90ms

162ms

Samsung
SE-S184M

30.84x

16.51x

40.73x

105ms

108ms

178ms

Pioneer
DVR-112

31.95x

18.38x

41.36x

116ms

132ms

199ms

The Pioneer DVR-112 performed above average with our CD-R test disc.

CD Re-writable discs:

Again, we made a copy of the original Roxio Media Creator 7.5 install CD; this time we used a Verbatim Ultra Speed (32X) CD-RW disc made by Mitsubishi Chemicals Corporation.

The Pioneer DVR-112 reached 32.94x read speed. Let’s compare it with some other drives below.

CD-RW
Discs

Average 
Read
Speed

Start
 Read 
Speed

End
 Read 
Speed

Seek
Times
 Random

Seek
 Times 
1/3

Seek
 Times 
Full

NEC
ND-4550A

30.66x

17.92x

40.12x

134ms

141ms

214ms

NEC
ND-4551A

30.63x

17.94x

40.08x

171ms

166ms

317ms

Philips
DVDR1660

30.75x

17.67x

40.55x

106ms

115ms

170ms

Samsung
SH-W162L

30.84x

17.52x

40.68x

87ms

90ms

159ms

Samsung
SH-S182D

30.65x

16.43x

40.44x

91ms

90ms

163ms

Samsung
SE-S184M

31.17x

16.75x

41.15x

102ms

107ms

176ms

Pioneer
DVR-112

24.96x

14.61x

32.94x

117ms

131ms

205ms

The Pioneer DVR-112 proved to be the slowest drive when reading CD-RW media.

100 minute CD-R:

The Pioneer DVR-112 reached 42.67x when reading our test 100 minute CD-R, the DVR-112 failed to complete the seek time tests ending with an error.

Audio – Digital Audio Extraction:

To test the digital audio extraction performance of the Pioneer DVR-112, again we used Nero CD/DVD-Speed to measure the transfer rate. The audio disc we used is slightly larger than the disc used for the other tests, to be exact it’s nearly 79 minutes in length (78:53:31).

The Pioneer DVR-112 reached 42.44x when reading our test audio disc. Let’s compare it with some drives below.

Audio
Discs

Average 
Read
Speed

Start
 Read 
Speed

End
 Read 
Speed

Seek
Times
 Random

Seek
 Times 
1/3

Seek
 Times 
Full

NEC
ND-4550A

31.33x

17.97x

40.11x

123ms

138ms

220ms

NEC
ND-4551A

31.30x

17.89x

40.13x

122ms

142ms

222ms

Philips
DVDR1660

37.42x

20.09x

49.65x

107ms

125ms

173ms

Samsung
SH-W162L

31.55x

17.57x

41.85x

86ms

101ms

172ms

Samsung
SH-S182D

31.39x

17.68x

41.61x

88ms

104ms

181ms

Samsung
SE-S184M

31.46x

17.67x

41.77x

111ms

128ms

192ms

Pioneer
DVR-112

31.61X

19.04X

42.44X

132MS

152MS

223MS

The Pioneer DVR-112 performed about average when reading our audio test CD.

Audio Extraction:

For this test we used EAC (Exact Audio Copy) to test the drives Audio extraction performance. As we can see from the screenshot below, the drive supports accurate stream and audio caching, but doesn't support C2 error info.

 

Below is the results produced by EAC:

Burst mode.

Secure mode.

The Pioneer DVR-112 performed well in burst mode but was much slower in secure mode.

Advanced audio – DAE quality test:

Before we move on to testing DVD read speeds, we will take a last audio test, and this time we used the “Advanced DAE Quality Test” feature in CD-Speed. For this test we used a CD-R media from RICOH (Thanks to RICOH Europe (BV) for sending us this media).

 

The extraction quality was excellent however; the Pioneer DVR-112 did not do well with the copy on the fly tests.

DVD reading performance:


Again, we will use Nero CD-Speed to measure the reading performance, this time for various types of DVD discs. The drive should read pressed single layer DVD-discs at 16X.

Pressed DVD Video:

For our DVD reading performance tests we are going to start with a single and Double Layered DVD video discs. While only 1X speed is required to watch DVD movies, it’s useful to be able to read the discs at higher speeds if you’re going to extract (rip) the content of the disc to your hard drive.

DVD Video (single layer)

DVD Video (double layer OTP)

DVD Video (double layer PTP)

The Pioneer DVR-112 is not riplocked and read our single layer disc at 16x and our double layer test discs at 12x

 

DVD
Video

Average 
Read
Speed
(SL)

Start
 Read 
Speed
(SL)

End
 Read 
Speed
(SL)

Average 
Read
Speed
(DL)

Start
 Read 
Speed
(DL)

End
 Read 
Speed
(DL)

NEC
ND-4550A

11.84x

6.57x

15.82x

8.90x

4.95x

11.83x

NEC
ND-4551A

11.83x

6.56x

15.77x

8.89x

4.94x

11.82x

Philips
DVDR1660

12.00x

6.64x

15.99x

9.05x

5.00x

12.04x

Samsung
SH-W162L

12.12x

6.78x

16.16x

6.44x

3.60x

8.57x

Samsung
SH-S182D

12.06x

6.66x

16.07x

6.41x

3.58x

8.52x

Samsung
SE-S184M

12.22x

6.75x

16.29x

6.38x

3.61x

8.29x

Pioneer
DVR-112

11.99x

6.74x

16.03x

9.36x

5.31x

12.44

The Pioneer DVR-112 performed well in our single layer test and was the fastest drive in our double layer read tests.

DVD – DVD+R/RW:


For this test we used a Verbatim 16X DVD+R and a RICOH 8X DVD+RW with about 4.4Gb of data. Below are the results:

DVD+R

DVD+RW

DVD+R
DVD+RW

Average 
Read
Speed
(+R)

Start
 Read 
Speed
(+R)

End
 Read 
Speed
(+R)

Average 
Read
Speed
(+RW)

Start
 Read 
Speed
(+RW)

End
 Read 
Speed
(+RW)

NEC
ND-4550A

11.93x

6.53x

15.95x

9.79x

5.40x

13.08x

NEC
ND-4551A

11.95x

6.59x

15.98x

9.79x

5.37x

13.08x

Philips
DVDR1660

9.38x

5.13x

12.53x

9.38x

5.13x

12.54x

Samsung
SH-W162L

9.15x

5.03x

12.22x

6.24x

3.45x

8.34x

Samsung
SH-S182D

9.09x

5.02x

12.16x

6.21x

3.43x

8.29x

Samsung
SE-S184M

9.12x

5.00x

12.06x

6.23x

3.43x

8.33x

Pioneer
DVR-112

9.36x

5.19x

12.23x

6.25x

3.47x

8.35x

The Pioneer DVR-112 performed about average when reading our test DVD+R/RW test discs. Now let’s see how it will perform with DVD-R/RW.

DVD – DVD-R/RW:


For this test we used a Verbatim 16X DVD-R disc and a Verbatim 6X DVD-RW disc filled with about 4.4Gb of data. Our test results are found below:

DVD-R

DVD-RW

There are hardly any differences in the speed, compared to reading the DVD+R/RW discs.

DVD-R
DVD-RW

Average 
Read
Speed
(-R)

Start
 Read 
Speed
(-R)

End
 Read 
Speed
(-R)

Average 
Read
Speed
(-RW)

Start
 Read 
Speed
(-RW)

End
 Read 
Speed
(-RW)

NEC
ND-4550A

11.97x

6.58x

16.01x

9.78x

5.37x

13.07x

NEC
ND-4551A

11.98x

6.56x

15.98x

9.78x

5.37x

13.07x

Philips
DVDR1660

9.37x

5.13x

12.53x

9.38x

5.13x

12.53x

Samsung
SH-W162L

9.18x

5.08x

12.26x

6.24x

3.44x

8.34x

Samsung
SH-S182D

9.12x

5.05x

12.19x

6.22x

3.43x

8.31x

Samsung
SE-S184M

9.14x

5.03x

12.21x

6.24x

3.44x

8.34x

Pioneer
DVR-112

9.36x

5.18x

12.52x

6.23x

3.46x

8.33x

Once again the Pioneer DVR-112 performed about average when reading our DVD-R/RW test discs.

DVD±R DL discs:


DVD+R DL:

The Pioneer DVR-112 read our DVD+R DL test disc at 8x reading speed.

DVD-R DL:

The Pioneer DVR-112 read our DVD-R DL test disc at 8x reading speed.

DVD-RAM:


The Pioneer DVR-112 read our DVD-RAM disc at 12x using a P-CAV reading method.

Summary:

The Pioneer DVR-112 proved to be a reliable reader and had little or no problems reading all our test discs. The Pioneer DVR-112 however was not the fastest reader we have reviewed.

Now let’s head over to the next page where we will test CD-R/RW writing performance……

Want to submit your own review? Click here
Reactions on this item
crap review where are the advance tests to test error correction and audio protections
@Sean
Protected audio CD's are not available in my location. Maybe you can send me some to test :*
Its a good review, thanks for posting its chipset..
I like that writer and review :) :B
I am confused as to why this drive got editors choice and the DRW-1612BL didn't as it is the only sheep 3 burner I have ever seen. What makes this burner better then the DRW-1612BL?
^ Writing quality on all media groups won it the award.
"As we can see from the screenshot below, the drive supports accurate stream and C2 error info and doesn’t support caching."

Doesn't screenshot show contrary(C2 - no, cache - yes)? Or it is wrong screenshot?
^ Correct screenshot but wrong information. I corrected it now, thanks for reporting it. :X

This message was edited at: 12-04-2007 20:20

This message was edited at: 12-04-2007 20:20
I've bought this burner because of the "editors choice" and because it "can be used along with Nero CD-Speed for Disc Quality Scanning”. To my surprise Disc Quality Scanning is completely irrealistic (e.g. PIE is about 10 times higher that with Lite-ON). Googling showed that it's a known problem of all Pioneer burners. For example, see that link
http://www.videohelp.com/forum/archive/t319198.html
Please update the review, because it's misleading.
Other makes of drives report PI/PIF errors differently than Lite-On and Plextor drives, NEC and BenQ for example.
The fact is they do support PI/PIF scanning just like the Pioneer drives do and that is all that is claimed in the review.
Pioneers do report the errors, but PIE level is far beyond the 280 set by DVD+/-R specifivation. Consequently that reporting has a very limited utility. ;) In addition huge spikes (up to PIE > 17 000) are often present on the graphs.

Your answer reminds me an old story with hotel reservation in India. If you just reserve a room with aircond there is a great chance that it will not working. In fact you must always precise "with working aircond" while booking. :)

I refolmulate me request. Could you please precise in the review that although the error reporting is indeed working, but the PIE level always exeeds the DVD+/-R specs. That is not the case with Lite-on, BENQ, NEC and Plextor.
"but the PIE level always exeeds the DVD+/-R specs. That is not the case with Lite-on, BENQ, NEC and Plextor."
This is not the case, BenQ and NEC drives often report out of spec scans on perfectly good burns. The Pioneer scan in the review is within specifcation. :*
OK, the aircond is blowing the air. And we don't care that the air is hot ;)
has anyone used this burner with the wytron 688 ? i am 5 of them with a wytron 688 andhave been burning successfully at 8x, just wondering if anyone is burning at a faster rate with success.
CRAP! Pioneer SUCK!, i have just returned my 5th drive for replacement, dont buy this shit, pioneer drives are cheap for a reason, they suck!.

I guarantee if you buy this, you will have lazer failiure in months, you have been warned. :r
Bought BestBuy's version of the DVR-112D, died inside of a week.

A week later bought 2 Pioneer DVR-112D's from NewEgg, both of them are still working perfectly since March 2007, nothing but smooth sailing.

Also, overall the best DVD burner I've owned, next to the BenQ 1640...^_^
return my 112D. It will just stop writing on Verbatim/Sony/Philips and hang the whole computer.
This test is very funny because it's so misleading.

It totally ignores the lack of write quality as revealed in the well-known German computer magazine "c't" issue 2007/11 p. 122 which affects not only the Pioneer DVR-112 but a couple of new competitors drives as well.

Compared to an old test where they tested the DVR-111 (which I own) the write quality of the DVR-111 exceeded the write quality of the DVR-112 except for CD-R where the DVR-112 was better.

If these problems are not firmware based I would rather buy a DVR-111 again than a DVR-112.

c't assumes that the enourmous price pressure may have caused the degraded write quality with those new drives (not only Pioneer!) in their test.
I bought 3 of these. All are now in the bin. 2 would still burn DVD's but won't read or write CD's!!!
I'm looking for some 110's or even 111's to replace them with.
Might try lite-on's instead next batch. Nightmare for me as a supplier. Cost me heaps ... just replacing discs alone.
Took 46 minutes to read 26% of a test-recorded dvd-ram of just 1minute 48 seconds recording time.
No problem with any other type of disc. Awaiting advice from Pioneer.
Had 111D before this burner, excellent performer but couldn't write to dvd-ram.
My Plextor PX-760A failed again, my first PX-760A lived only 12 months, then I purchased a PX760A - lived for 5 months. The returned unit wrote disks at very bad quality and was replaced 2 weeks after. 6 months after that, on 2007-September 4th I just sent that 3rd PX-760A for warranty services. It did about 15 Excellent quality recordings on DVD+R16 Plextor media (I haven't used it more), but now it stopped writing on DVD+/-RW. That's total of 4 recorders send for warranty services, I'm waiting to receive the 5th. I have 9 more months remaining for warranty services, I bet it won't make it :(

By the way I'm going to buy another brand recorder for fail safe. Plextor - King of the quality? Well yes, but as well king of short life and failures! My opinion: never again!

I wonder what should I buy for second (backup-reserve) recorder? I was just thinking about Pioneer, while reading this review, when I read in the previous comments that they live short too. What a shame on Pioneer!

Stays in PIO mode, can't seem to force it into DMA. Thus, record speed maxes at 1X for DVD+RW. Bleah! :(
Replaced my first one for a second and this second one seems to have problems with audio extraction, some glitches which a generic DVD-reader doesn't produce...
I added two of these drives when I built a new system in January. I finally got me some ultra high speed CR-RWs (24X rewrite speed)from Memorix as I tend to create a lot of CDs that I rewrite often. Looks like this drive has issues re-writing to this brand of CD-RWs at anything over 12x. I've had mulitple verification failures at speeds of 16x or higher. Testing using the latest CDSpeed Nero utility now called DiskSpeed not DriveSpeed. AFAIK I have the latest firmware...124.
Gonna replace both of these with some newer DVR-115's
What do you think? Leave your comments!

Your message
:) :( ;) :r :d :B :X :c :o :g :+ :p :* :S

Your name
Your e-mail


Type in the code

Don't like to type in this code? Please register or login.
Related tags
A tag is a relevant keyword or term associated with or assigned to a piece of information (like picture, product, or video clip), thus describing the item and enabling keyword-based classification of information it is applied to. We use it to make searching our database easier and enable all our users to contribute to our database.

Add related tags
CD Freaks allows items to be tagged with objective specifications, no opinions or subjective descriptions. When your start typing our system will suggest tags, if this is what you mean, please use these first. Our system will also check for spelling mistakes and correct them to keep our database consistent. Finally tags are moderated by our team members.

    Related content
    Related reviews/articles
    Visit the Forum
    Get the latest reviews via RSS RSS