CDFreaks Poll
I buy a console for gaming only
Yes
No
Based on 1328 ratings

detail information

Posted by Dennis
Posted on 26/09/02 18:39
Number of views 9111
Menu
Scratched/Low Quality Disc
 

It happens to all of us sooner or later: a disc is scratched and cannot be read properly anymore... In this test we took a CD-Recordable and (heavily) scratched it with some fine sandpaper. We then did a surface scan with Nero CD Speed and you can see the results below. First off let's start with the ATIP information from the used CD-Recordable:

  • ATIP: 97m 15s 11f
  • Disc Manufacturer: Ritek Co.
  • Reflective layer: Dye (Long strategy; e.g. Cyanine, Azo etc.)
  • Media type: CD-Recordable
  • Recording Speeds: min. unknown - max. unknown
  • Nominal Capacity: 702.83MB (79m 59s 74f / LBA: 359849)

Now for the achieved results. We read the disc with the Plextor PX-W4824A drive and then read the same disc with several other recorders for comparison. You can see the result of the Plextor drive in the screenshot below. Please note that damaged sectors can still be read. The important percentage is the one of the unreadable sectors. Of course the less, the better:

Plextor PX-W4824A Scratched Disc Test
Plextor PX-W4824A reading scratched disc

In the table below we've summed up our test results comparing them to other drives we've previously reviewed. Again, keep in mind that the important percentage is the one of the unreadable sectors. Of course the less, the better:

Scratched
Disc
 Good   Damaged   Unreadable 
 PleXCombo 
PX-208TU
55.80%28.53%15.67%
 VisionTek 
Xtasy 48X
36.89%44.41%18.70%
 PleXCombo 
 PX-320A 
 64.58% -35.42%
TEAC
 CD-W540E 
 32.08% 27.38%40.54%
Plextor
 PX-W4824A 
 41.90% 9.30%48.80%
 Yamaha 
CRW3200E
48.59%-51.41%
 Plextor 
 PX-W4012TU 
 35.95% 8.78%55.28%
 Yamaha 
CRW-F1
37.72%-62.28%
 The grey area's indicate the least amount of unreadable sectors 
- : drive cannot report damaged sectors

Low Quality Disc:

To add a little more to our scratched data reading tests we've added another test for you. We wrote a low quality 74 minute CD-Recordable using the VisionTek Xtasy 48X drive and Nero Burning Rom. We disabled its SMART-BURN feature so errors would probably be created. The ATIP information from the used CD-Recordable:

  • ATIP: 97m 31s 01f
  • Disc Manufacturer: unknown
  • Reflective layer: Dye (Long strategy; e.g. Cyanine, Azo etc.)
  • Media type: CD-Recordable
  • Recording Speeds: min. unknown - max. unknown
  • Nominal Capacity: 656.69MB (74m 45s 00f)

We then scanned the disc with Nero CD Speed using various drives we've previously reviewed. You can see a screenshot of the Plextor PX-W4824A drive reading the low quality disc below:

Plextor PX-W4824A reading low quality disc
Plextor PX-W4824A reading low quality disc

In the table below we've summed up our test results again, comparing them to other drives we've previously reviewed. Again, keep in mind that the important percentage is the one of the unreadable sectors. Of course the less, the better:

Scratched
Disc
 Good   Damaged   Unreadable 
Plextor
 PX-W4012TU 
 99.44% 0.56%0.0%
PleXCombo
 PX-208TU 
 89.60% 10.40%0.0%
 VisionTek 
Xtasy 48X
59.44%40.56%0.0%
 PleXCombo 
 PX-320A 
 89.49% -10.51%
Plextor
 PX-W4824A 
 71.41% 7.68%20.90%
TEAC
 CD-W540E 
 66.21% 11.75%22.03%
Mitsumi
 CR-480ATE 
 60.34% -39.66%
 Yamaha 
CRW-F1
48.81%-51.19%
 The grey area's indicate the least amount of unreadable sectors 
- : drive cannot report damaged sectors

Conclusion:

When reading the heavily scratched disc and the low quality disc the Plextor drive gets an average place. It's certainly not the best drive we've seen when it comes to reading scratched and low quality discs but it's also not the worst drive we've seen. Perhaps this performance can be improved via a firmware upgrade.

That concludes the reading part of our review. Now it's time to see how the Plextor PX-W4824A performs when writing discs...

Want to submit your own review? Click here
Negative Points: DAE and CD-RW reading is limited to about 42X

AND YOU WOULD CALL THIS BAD?!?!?!? i know it is *a*little* different from what they claimed, but it is a fuc*ing high reading speed! :)
Great review as always! :)

I wonder why Plextor bothered to implement this SpeedRead thing when the difference is so small (max. 46x vs. max. 42x)
Surely this small difference can't be so much more dangerous?
Other than that it seems like a huge improvement over the Plextor 40x.

btw. why not use CD Speed 1.00, it supports 99min discs.
@cico85: Plextor drives have always been considered to be the fastest DAE drives available. Their 40X model could already do DAE at 42X so we were a little disappointed. There are other drives nowadays that can do DAE at 48X without problems. So yes it's a negative point.

@cdrfreak: Nero CD Speed v1.00 didn't work so well for us as we had some problems with our tests. Transfer Speed didn't go faster than 24X for instance.. So for the time being we decided to use good old v0.85e.
Good review!
The Plex seems to b a decent drive.....IF the price was lower..there are drives that can "handle" much more protections,for a much lower price,....
Sorry Plextor,you can't sell a drive to me..:4
Nice review!

I already ordered one. The price €134,95 was also nice ....... :*
Please Compare the plextor 48/24/48 to the teac 540A. I am deciding between the two. i don't care as much about speed, or noise as i do about good backups of a large variety of media. Compare, Contrast.... Thanks for you help in advance....
T
i searched how do i copy copy-protected playstation discs. I already have a dvd burner, I don't want another one, I just wanna know how I can copy games which i cannot copy eg. tomb raider 2. hit me back soon. thanx.
What do you think? Leave your comments!

Your message
:) :( ;) :r :d :B :X :c :o :g :+ :p :* :S

Your name
Your e-mail


Type in the code

Don't like to type in this code? Please register or login.
Related tags
A tag is a relevant keyword or term associated with or assigned to a piece of information (like picture, product, or video clip), thus describing the item and enabling keyword-based classification of information it is applied to. We use it to make searching our database easier and enable all our users to contribute to our database.

Add related tags
CD Freaks allows items to be tagged with objective specifications, no opinions or subjective descriptions. When your start typing our system will suggest tags, if this is what you mean, please use these first. Our system will also check for spelling mistakes and correct them to keep our database consistent. Finally tags are moderated by our team members.

    Related reviews/articles
    Get the latest reviews via RSS RSS