Sony BWU-200S detail information
| Posted by | Kip R. |
| Posted on | 12/01/08 05:13 |
| Number of views | 15263 |
| Manufacturer | Sony |
| Product | Sony BWU-200S |
| Description | Internal Blu-ray Disc Rewritable Drive |
Writing Quality with CD-R/RW discs
Now we are going to test CD-R discs from different CD-R manufacturers. To measure the write speed we will use the “Create Data CD” function from within Nero DiscSpeed. We wrote these discs at the maximum speed that the drive supports. For the quality test, we also used Nero DiscSpeed. DiscSpeed runs under Windows and supports several drives. Also note that different drives and different reading speeds may affect the results obtained when scanning the discs. We used a BenQ DVD DW1650 with firmware BCDC and scanned these discs at 48X speed.
Disc Quality Scanning - C1/C2 (and CU); here is an explanation in more detail:
CDs use an error detection and correction system (CIRC) which is for the most part not seen by the user when reading the disc. We can get a working idea of the quality of the media in question by performing Disc Quality Scanning that will show us the amount of errors the drive is detecting and correcting while reading the media.
There is more than one way to handle C1 and C2 error detection/correction, but a simple and common way is to detect and correct up to two errors per frame in each stage and detect three or more errors:
-
E11: 1 error detected and corrected by C1 layer
-
E21: 2 errors detected and corrected by C1 layer
-
E31: 3 or more errors detected but not corrected by C1 layer
The sum of these (per second) is called the BLock Error Rate: BLER=E11+E21+E31
-
E12: 1 error detected and corrected by C2 layer
-
E22: 2 errors detected and corrected by C2 layer
-
E32: 3 or more errors detected but not corrected by C2 layer
Any E31 is uncorrectable by the C1 layer and will result in the bytes in that frame being redistributed into multiple frames which are passed to the C2 layer.
Any E32 is uncorrectable by the C2 layer and will result in interpolation being used for Audio CDs or will result in third layer error correction being use for Data CDs.
Different drives have different ways of reporting these errors in a Disc Quality scan. For example the following drives will report C1 and C2 errors this way:
BenQ DW1650 Disc Quality:
-
C1=BLER=E11+E21+E31
-
C2=E32
BenQ DW1650 Advanced Disc Quality:
-
All errors are reported separately as well as BLER=E11+E21+E31
Lite-On SOHR-5239V:
-
C1=BLER=E11+E21+E31
-
C2=E32
Here is a little easier way to look at Disc Quality Scanning:
A written CD-R disc will always have some C1 errors; C1 errors are easily corrected by the drive's error correction capabilities. The next level of errors is C2, while C2 errors could also be corrected by most drive's error correction capabilities; multiple C2 errors in the same frame are not wanted on a good quality disc. A good disc should not contain any C2 errors of the E22 or E32 kind, and preferably have an average C1 error amount of below 2.0 for the best quality discs, or at least below 10.0 averages for good quality discs. After C2 errors, there are only un-correctable errors that will make a disc unusable.
So, in short, our analysis will be based on these guidelines to determine the quality of the burned discs which will be Quality Scanned on our BenQ DW1650:
CD-R/RW quality scans guideline

And below are the obtained results:
Writing Data CD-R discs
For our data writing tests, we simply set up a new compilation of 703Mb using Nero Burning ROM software. Writing method used is DAO (Disc At Once), and the disc is set up as a non-multisession disc with “finalize disc” enabled. The screenshot below shows how long it takes to write a disc at the highest speed. (40x):

The Sony BWU-200S completed this burn in 3 minutes and 12 seconds.
Now let’s take a closer look at writing quality using CD-R media with the Sony BWU-200S.


Advanced Disc Quality Scan with Stats at 16X CLV

Disc Quality Scan at 48X

This Sony BWU-200S handled this media with very good results.


Advanced Disc Quality Scan with Stats at 16X CLV

Disc Quality Scan at 48X

The Sony BWU-200S did excellent with this media from Memorex.


Advanced Disc Quality Scan with Stats at 16X CLV

Disc Quality Scan at 48X

Here we see excellent results with this Taiyo Yuden media.


Advanced Disc Quality Scan with Stats at 16X CLV

Disc Quality Scan at 48X

The Sony BWU-200S writes to this media with excellent results.


Advanced Disc Quality Scan with Stats at 16X CLV

Disc Quality Scan at 48X

The Sony BWU-200S writes to this Maxell CD-R Music media with excellent results.
Now we will see how the Sony BWU-200S performs with our CD-RW media…..
Writing Quality with Re-Writable discs


Advanced Disc Quality Scan with Stats at 16X CLV

Disc Quality Scan at 48X

The Sony BWU-200S did well with this media which can be problematic with some burners.
We will also test the Sony BWU-200S with the Memorex 12X CD-RW disc:


Advanced Disc Quality Scan with Stats at 16X CLV

Disc Quality Scan at 48X

The Sony BWU-200S was able to write to this media with good results; Advance Quality Scan reporting “Class 2” media quality while KProbe showing 2 C2 errors, which probably a software glitch.
Summary
Overall the disc quality scans on our BenQ DW-1650 and our Lite-On 5239V using KProbe show very good to excellent results on both CD-R and CD-RW test media.

Check out your player's format capability before burning any discs with any BD burner. Some players (like my Panny) will play only BDMV format; some players will play BDAV. This burner will burn either, but some burning software won't support BDAV. I am using Ulead Movie Factory with the HD add-in; it will burn either format.
Others have noted that the Sony's drawer won't fit thru a normal cutout - that was the situation with my Dell XPS400. Tried trimming out the hole in the Dell; gave up and mounted the burner in an external enclosure.
Overall, thumbs up even at the $600USD price.














It is actually a cannabilized external one for a DVD drive. External 5.25" SATA enclosures are a little hard to find and are well over $50 when you do. I had to run a power cable and SATA cable out of the back of the PC and the back of the external enclosure. The enclosure I use has a power switch that is not maintained and the PC showed drive not available when booting if the power was not on. So, I ran an cable from the PC power supply. Kinda junky doing it that way, but it works.



Reading Performance
add a tag